Re: IML: Unsatisfacory free Imperial
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IML: Unsatisfacory free Imperial



however, it is a shame to see so much good steel going to waste. they might have made someone a very nice project.some have more dollars than sence...............

gale gregg <tumblingg2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
just goes to show, there are no free cars..........

Hugh & Therese <hugtrees@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi everyone. Long time no see and all that. My poor old 1958 is still in
pieces. Its engine has been rebuilt, along with the transmission, but both
sit, shrink wrapped yet, on a pallet, waiting to be reinstalled. The
trucking company that volunteered to get the work done for the
transportation museum I work for bought 36 eighteen wheeler tractor rigs and
decided that refitting them was of greater importance than "my" Imperial.
The philistines!

I have been so busy and am so broke I don't have enough time to pay
attention, so I can ride out a year - almost - without an Imperial. I
think.

I went to see to cars today that were being offered to the museum as a gift
for tax write off purposes. One was a 1958 Packard. The other was a 1967
Imperial four door hardtop. Did you notice I used the past tense? Both
were ruined beyond any hope of reasonable restoration. I had to decline the
offer. How bad is that when an avowed 1958 Imperial fan turns down a free
Imperial a free 1958 Packard?

Pretty bad, and it gets worse. He also had a 1967 Imperial with the mobile
director interior. It was in worse shape than the four door hardtop. Then
he says he has recently put a couple of cars, including a 1964 Imperial,
"over the scale." In other words he sold them for scrap. And so it goes.

He is not interested in selling the cars, only in using them for a tax
write-off to off set some capital gains. Its isn't my job to abuse people -
feel free to laugh (or cry) - so what I said was he really should check with
his accountant that it wasn't going to be a problem that he was going to use
high values as a donation and that we would not as recipients. He asked me
how much we would write down. I said maybe $100.00 a piece, tops.

The 67 Imperial was not that bad. Body pretty straight and paint
serviceable. It looked white to me but he called it midnight blue. The
black vinyl roof was OK. The interior was shot. It rained last night and
it smelled pretty rank. Two guys were working under the hood. I asked if
they were getting it going but it turned out they were just reinstalling
stuff. Stuff like the heads. Rusty cylinder walls, anyone?

The museum has been trying to unload some cars recently. Cars that were
taken in a long time ago under different leadership, to give juicy tax right
offs to some wealthy city residents. The game just isn't worth the candle.
What happened is that our museum ended up looking like this guys quite large
yard. Dozens of cars in various states of decay being mercilessly attacked
by the Texan sun. Very attractive.

This guy had bought all these cars at rock bottom prices with a view to
restoring them sooner or later. It's a shame, really, this ignorant
collecting that keeps good cars away from caring individuals. The 1967 was
probably a very nice car when this guy acquired it.

I am not slamming people who have large collections and take care of them.
Make no mistake, the man I was talking with today is a wealthy guy. Very.
And he isn't interested in selling them. I know someone who would like to
get the 58 Packard but it will probably end up in the crusher, sooner or
later. I just cannot afford the time and energy required to get them, store
them, sell them and ship them. Not for just a couple hundred dollars. It
also isn't my job to create a tax dodge for the guy who has neglected all
these cars for so long. Who knows why he bought them in the first place?
Who knows why so many? I'm having a hard enough time already with the 1973
Imperial, finding someone who wants to work on it since no one wants to buy
it. (It doesn't run, has been out in the sun for five years, looks bad and
will cost over a grand to ship - but it is cheap!)

The 73 Imperial was taken in as a donor's tax write off as well. One of the
last we took for that reason. We are more discriminating now. We have to
be. Sometimes, even when it's free, it's still too expensive.

Hugh




----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm


Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com



Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.