Re: IML: Roger- re 62 red imp from Arizona

[RandalPark@xxxxxxx]

I think that he indicated that the 36 meant that it was a 361 engine instead of the 413. I believe that "cubically challenged" was his way of saying that the engine is probably too small. If the car runs good and the price is right, it wouldn't bother me that much.

Paul

In an email dated Wed, 5 1 2005 7:23:00 pm GMT, JAGCAD1@xxxxxxx writes:

>I'm considering buying this car, now in FLA, and read that when you saw it 
>you could plainly see _36 stamped on the pad. ? You also noted that it was a 
>cubically challanged Imperial. Before I spend a fortune could you be more 
>specific and tell me what you mean by cubicaally challanged? ? I believe that the 
>correct engine should be 413- what are the effects of the car having a _36 engine 
>on the performance and value. Thank you so much for any info you can provide.
>
>Stephen
>San Diego
>


-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm