--- MARK J HASH <mjh@WANWEB.NET> wrote: > Since I'm from the school of the 'mechanically > declined,' I'll ask the question: what benefits > would one derive from having the bearing journals > finished .001 inch undersize or having the tappet > bodies be .008 inch oversize? No "benefits" per se; this simply allowed the factory to use parts that varied from the blueprint standard, altho in their opinion not by enough to render said part unusable. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com |
Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.
Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of
their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be
compensated.