Re: [FWDLK] REGARDING JUNKED/SMASHED/RECYCLED CARS
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [FWDLK] REGARDING JUNKED/SMASHED/RECYCLED CARS



On Wed, 9 Dec 1998 11:12:06 EST Richard Allen <RAllen9081@xxxxxxx>
writes:
>You know we here at the Forward Look list tend to be a great deal
>more
>intelligent than the average human. Not to mention that we have taste
>and a
>sense for what design is all about. Considering that many of us were
>flabbergasted at the apparent fascist influence on our sacred car
>manufacturer
>(joking now, remember that) why is it that many of us take a real
>fascist view
>towards those not as smart as we are? Most people when they see a car
>that is
>"older than dirt", (the dirt on their cars), think it is just junk,
>that it
>must not work well or efficiently anymore not to mention that its not
>the
>"latest style". (Especially since their sense of style is dictated to
>them via
>advertisements or commercials) We however being of the brightest of
>the
>species know differently and can see the beauty in perhaps lets say a
>"1959
>Plymouth Belvedere 4 door sedan with posts" (my car). while it is fun
>to poke
>fun at their idiocy and perhaps even jokingly suggest that "Christine"
>might
>pay them a visit, I most strongly believe that we of the "higher
>order" desist
>from causing said "intellectually, and design challenged folk- (i.e.,-
>lacking
>of the "frontal lobe")" any pain and sorrow such as Flaming them via
>e-mail.
>We of course understand that they cannot possibly understand that "one
>mans
>trash is another's treasure" due to their mental and emotional
>inadequacies.
>It is sad that our potential treasures were trashed but it is equally
>sad that
>they do not get it, yes? Yet the problem is most probably one of
>genetics me
>thinks. We should therefor exert our superior level of compassion and
>let them
>be though it is still fun for us to Rag them here on the site.
>Besides, one
>thing is for sure. Not to be materialistic, but our cars recently went
>up in
>value and rarity due to this "stogie sucking commoner" (no comment on
>those of
>you who occasionally consume Monicas favorite) 's recent blunder. It
>is a
>shame we couldn't educate him in time and help him to realize all the
>potential income he has lost eh? So much for my two cents worth via
>the peanut
>gallery. Yall have fun and not take it all so seriously folks. Being
>superior
>doesn't mean we can wipe out the scourge that befalls our society.
>Finns Rule,
>you know it, I know it, and they..............just dont get
>it!..........ric
>Hiel Exner! heil Exner!
>
Dear Richard,

Nicely put. But I do see the other side of the fence as well.
It was a down right shame, when he told us that the cars would be there,
to just go ahead and scrap them.

We will never know what cars could have come from THOSE he hath scrapped!

(the little doomkoff!)

David




Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.