Actually the chrome is just a flash over the nickel to keep it from tarnishing. You are really looking at the Nickel with a bit of additional color added by putting the thin chrome on top of it. MY luck with the so called Triple plating is to see it peel off the bumpers I have had it on. I believe the copper plating tanks are a bit more of an EPA problem and this had helped minimize their use. Korean chrome which is common in early 50s products was a situation where the Chrome was needed for the "War" effort and not allowed on cars. A plastic coating of some sort was used on the nickel and leaves a much poorer piece. Nickel was thin also and the copper did seem to show in some cases. ----- Original Message ----- From: "bill g" <nilla6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <L-FORWARDLOOK@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 7:22 AM Subject: Re: [FWDLK] Chroming > My information is limited and not recent. Industrial nickel plating > is used where corrosion is a problem (nuclear plants for example). > > Triple chrome plating, if still done, starts with a base of copper > plating followed by nickel and then chrome. You have to be sure the > chrome plating is thick enough or there may be an off color to it. > As I understand it, this process has to do with adhesion of the > plating. The nickel may be used to keep the copper color from showing. > > -bill grubbs > '56 DeSoto Firedome > Atlanta, GA > > At 12:42 PM 3/25/01 +0200, you wrote: > >Hi guys, > >I was offered different re-chroming process from two re-chroming shops here > >in France. One offered copper based chroming and the other bi-nickel based > >chroming. I have an idea that the copper based one is the best. Can anyone > >confirm ? > >Vincent Van Humbeeck (France, 120 miles north of Paris) > >'58 Plymouth Belvedere Sport Coupe > > > -------------- > '56 DeSoto facts: > 0 to 60 (driver only) 10.1 seconds flat. > 0 to 60 (driver and 7 other adults and 4 kids, > a trunk full of luggage and towing a 36' > camper) 10.1 seconds flat.
|