I can attest to what Dave is saying about those
"decoders". They are clearly photocopies, as the paper is still snow white and
moreover the edges abruptly cut off where the original image was larger
than the copier's capability.
Brion Kidder
Aliso Viejo, CA
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 5:54 PM
Subject: [FWDLK] Rubbish de-coders on e-Bay...caveat emptor
!!!
Moparites!
Don't be tempted. These
are rubbish. I got burned. I see that the aptly self-named 'eyes4crime' has now
changed his wording. He used to say "ORIGINAL", in all his descriptions,which
they certainly are not. He offered me a refund, only if I posted him pos or
at least good neutral feedback. I told him, no way Jose ! So, no refund for
me, I posted his only 2 negatives for his nastiness in e-mails to me and for
sending me an incorrectly described item.
He sells photocopies, out of some book he
has, and bad ones at that. The total
amount for 2 'original' (not!!) de-coders was $21, so no help from e-Bay, who
deduct the first $25 from any successful claim.
All the info on the 1965 Chrysler de-coder he sent
me is right in my '65 parts book, in fact much more info is in that book.The
300F one is rubbish too.
Dave
in New Zealand
|