Re: [FWDLK] 56 D500-1 At Barrett Jackson
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [FWDLK] 56 D500-1 At Barrett Jackson



Tim, 

I know the owner/restorer of this Golden Lancer. He has told me that the dash one "option" was added during the recent restoration, using corect original parts. It is my understanding that this car is an original Golden Lancer D500, originally a single 4 bbl, converted to a dual quad. I hope to be able to take a closer look at it at Barrett Jackson on Wednesday. I have see his work before and it is VERY VERY good. This should be a very well done car and should bring big bucks. 

The owner of this car works for 57 Heaven and has restored most of the cars in the collection, including a dozen or so 57 Mopars. Check them out at:   
http://www.57heaven.com/  

Dave Homstad 
56 Dodge D500 

---- DupontTim@xxxxxxx wrote: 
> List, A 56 D500-1 is listed at Barrett-Jackson, # 1250.1, I have never heard 
> of this car before. If it is real it will be very interesting for me as I have 
> sought out this model for 12 plus years and have been the only owner of a 
> true documented Dash One example that is completely correct (as of this time and 
> to my knowledge). I know of others such as Dennis Kennedy who have sought an 
> example of the 56 D500-1 since the eighties. I have inquired to BJ about the 
> cars documentation, and will see if I can get a response. I recently have 
> located the build sheets (IBM cards) for a couple other Dash One Dodges and I am 
> confident on the codes that are associated with the model. If the owner can 
> confirm this car it will be great because it will be another example of an 
> extremely historic car, if not it will be a very big disappointment that another 
> undocumented Dash One is circulating as correct. Don't get me wrong there are 
> several recreations that are promoting this model in a big way, and it's great, but 
> they are not advertised as the real McCoy and this is as it should be.  I 
> sure hope it is real one so this historic model can get some well deserved 
> recognition. I do not feel that I need to have the only example, it's actually is 
> not a good thing for such an obscure car, but I do feel that I have been very 
> diligent to portray the car I own as a true example and only after complete 
> confirmation of it's originality from a viable source such as the Chrysler 
> Historical Society. I don't think I am off base to prefer that others do the due 
> diligence as well and confirm their car to a defining degree.  Tim in Golden
> 
> *************************************************************
> 
> To unsubscribe or set your subscription options, please go to
> http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1

*************************************************************

To unsubscribe or set your subscription options, please go to
http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1



Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.