I have no
specialized input on tranny fluids, except that I have always used Dextron in
all my Mopar trannys. I used it in my un-rebuilt 56 PowerFlite for 20 years,
until I replaced it with a 727 two years ago. It operated perfect, with crisp OEM
shifts, except for external seal leaks.
I did hear
at one time that Ford developed Type F for a reason. Somebody at Ford once
decided that money could be saved (the root of all weaknesses in most
cars) by reducing the number of
clutches in their tranny. Then it was found that they slipped too much, so a
new tranny fluid was developed that had more friction in the clutches. Thus
Type F, where the “F” stands for “friction”, not Ford. It is supposed to be
equal in lubricating the hard parts.
I did
contact a 40 year experienced 727 TF specialist. His opinion on fluids is in
the email below.
Dave
Homstad
56 Dodge
D500
-----Original Message-----
From: Pat Blais aka T'Flite Patty
[mailto:tflitepatty@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006
3:37 PM
To: 'David Homstad'
Subject: RE: TF transmission
fluids
Dave,
Opinions are, well…………opinions, eh ?
My 40+ years in the Torqueflite “hobby”, “avocation” and
finally “business” have made me acutely aware of the often very pointedly
focused opinions about automatic transmissions; objectivity is often tossed
aside, to the detriment of continuing education.
I am not familiar with the author of the ATF e-mail. Where
Mr. Riehl may have some validity to some of his viewpoints, it seems more to me
that much of it is “fringe element” opinion rather than accurate historical
fact. The general tone sounds a bit too much like all the blind rhetoric I’ve
heard over the years about how great shift kits work in Torqueflites; more on
that at a later time (in the negative by the way !).
The fluid listed in the Chrysler factory service manuals for
the cast-iron TF’s as well as the 1960’s TF’s is “type A, suffix A”; for many
years hence the newer fluids referenced the new fluids superceding the older
“type A, suffux A”. During a discussion of this subject at one of Chryler’s
traveling drag race seminars years ago the engineers were asked about B&M’s
blue “Trick Shift” fluid; the engineers explained the basics of fluid chemical
composition and that Ford type F fluid was more practical to substitute for the
expensive B&M fluid. They also explained that the Ford clutch friction
material and type F fluid were designed to work together, i.e., type of
material and fluid chemical makeup to effect appropriate shift quality.
Reference was made to “shift modifiers”, etc., most of which went over the
heads of us “non-engineer” types. They did point out that Chrysler and GM units
could use type F fluid and realize a bit of enhanced firmness to the shift
quality, but using the Chrysler/GM type ATF in Fords was not acceptable.
The statement about newer fluids causing separation of
friction material from their steel backing seems unlikely as the newer fluids
are generally superceding the older versions ?
My experience with the aluminum case Torqueflites begun in
the 1960’s primarily with the drag-race and high-performance crowd; they tend
to be an excellent test of component durability, both “soft parts” and “hard
parts”. From my experience exclusively with
the Torqueflite I believe more damage has been done by Chrysler’s
implementation of hydraulic restrictions and optimistic re-engineering of tried
and true methods, blind use by the aftermarket rebuilders of the more extensive
shift kits and marketing of exotic and expensive friction materials. A
testimony to this is a call from a local drag race customer recently that he
just attained
400 quarter mile runs with his mid-10 second car; he’s been
running on OEM Borg-Warner friction discs the entire time.
If the suggestion that the old ATF formulas turned to some
form of valve-body-blocking crystalline material was accurate I find it hard to
believe the information wouldn’t be burned into everyone’s mind ? In 40+ years including those of the
“type A, suffix A” era I’ve never seen evidence of that.
If you are inclined to gravitate towards the best fluid
available I’d suggest checking the synthetics; expensive comparatively but
offer many benefits including higher temperature capability, better chemical
composition, etc. Personally I’d suggest contacting someone long-tenured in the
petroleum industry to obtain accurate interpretations of the progression in ATF
formulations over the years. Much of the current makeup of ATF has been driven
by the implementation of the computer-controlled units absolutely requiring
enhanced lubrication and durability capabilities.
Let me know how your research comes out; I’m always
interested in hard, valid information to enhance my knowledge.
Thanks; let me know if I can be of further
assistance with parts or information.
Pat
Please note: PERSONAL or BUSINESS
checks require 15 BANKING days (approx. 21 calendar days) to clear before shipping merchandise.
Patrick Blais
Pat Blais Transmissions
Seattle
Specializing in 1960-1965 727 &
904 Torqueflites (1966+ also)
ALSO NOTE: new email address tflitepatty@xxxxxxxxxxx
Please visit our eBay
Store at: T'Flite Patty's Shop Mart
http://stores.ebay.com/TFlite-Pattys-Shop-Mart
-----Original
Message-----
From: David Homstad
[mailto:dhomstad@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday,
August 08, 2006 3:05 AM
To: Pat Blais aka
T'Flite Patty
Subject: TF transmission fluids
Pat,
Could you provide an opinion on the fluid advice in the email below?
Thanks.
I am still looking for a 21 tooth speedometer gear for my 62
TorqueFlite. A&A plans to reproduce them, but their vendor still hasn’t
started on them yet.
Thanks,
Dave Homstad
----- Original Message
-----
To: Wayne Graefen
Sent: Monday,
August 07, 2006 6:58 PM
Subject: Re: trans
fluid
Hi
Wayne;
The
best fluid to use in the older P/F, T/F and 727s and 904s, is type F. If F
cannot be found, type FA is O.K. FA has just a little more "slip"
additive. By no means use Mercon/Dextron. After a period of use, M/D
fluid will actually seperate the friction disc material from the steel backing.
Most other fluids will also damage the friction material.
In "modern" day cars, the trannys are set up to shift so that one
cannot "feel" the shifting. So, the manufacturers have formulated
fluids with more "slip" additive. Slippage of the friction discs
causes gradual degeneration of the discs. The "old" T/F and P/F
trannys always shifteed a little harder than other auto manufacturers trannys,
but they did last longer. Generally, 70 - 100K miles, most GM trannies
were shot. In the past, GM/Ford owners bought "Chryslers" and hated
the "harsher" shifting and went back to other manufacturers. Chrysler
trannys lasted well beyond 150+K miles. This also applies to the 727 trannys.
Some time ago, Chrysler Performance issued a bulletin about trans fluid and
suggested that type F be used in all 727s used in competition. This was the
result from the "drag" racing guys.
The "old" Type A-Suffix A fluid was manufactured with a parrifin base
material. When heated, the "wax" would turn into crystals (like rock
candy) and plug the passagages in the valve bodies, resulting in trans
failure. I have found this in a number of "used" trannys that I
have rebuilt that came from junkyards. One has to literally dig out the
passages with a screwdriver.
It is best to drop the pan and drain the converter. Clean the pan and scren.
AND, in some cases, drop the valve body and clean it thoroughly. That will add
life to a very good used tranny. And while one is at it, readjust the bands
(300s, front, 2 1/4 turns, rear band, 2 turns out) after tightening down both
band adhustments with about 75 inch pounds, then lock down the nut.
It's
like giving the tranny a S, S, S and then a good meal with new fluid.
And, when replacing the pan with a new gasket, make sure that you
"pound" down the raised bolt holes in the pan so the gasket seals
properly. Very important! And, please, do not use any silicone sealer.
Some tend to use way too much which in turn will "squeeze" out and
find the filter and plug it up. Bad news. Sometimes, even gets into the valve
bodies.
George Riehl