RE: [Chrysler300] Generator Vs. Alternator

["NOWOSACKI,JOHN (A-USA,ex1)" <john_nowosacki@xxxx>]

I wanted the reliability and availability of an alternator, and the
advantage of 15" wheels, which is why I got a 61 G instead. (I even got rid
of the toilet seat in the process)
But seriously, if you're on the road on a Saturday and the needle points to
'discharge', you'll have much better luck at NAPA or PEP BOYS when asking
for an alternator than a generator.
John

-----Original Message-----
From: Louis M. Barrie [mailto:lmbarrie@xxxx]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 4:54 PM
To: Chrysler 300 Club International, Inc.
Subject: [Chrysler300] Generator Vs. Alternator


Restoration is underway of our '60 300 F coupe. We are intending to make
Big Yellow an excellent driver with potential for show - but we want the
reliability factor. That brings us to the question - do we convert to
alternator or have the generator rebuilt? Other than originality, what's
the downside of converting? The car will be driven less than 5000 per year,
probably never more that 3 hours from home in Los Angeles, CA.

Louis M. Barrie



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


To send a message to this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

For list server instructions, go to
http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm 

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/