Re: [Chrysler300] 300F smog test
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chrysler300] 300F smog test



Greetings Group!
Thanks God I live in Montana where at least (so far) the politicians
have left us old car people alone and we don't have emission testing- 90% of
the vehicles used here for farm and ranch work would never pass! Many
ranchers remove the converters for fear of grass fires while using them in
the fields and pastures etc., those that don't use diesels. And yes our
sky's are still BIG SKY BLUE! Please remember though- tell all your
friends that drive brand X and blue ovals etc. that Montana really is the
pits and we don't have indoor plumbing and the hitchin' rail is still out
front for the horses.....Mine is but for the 300's horses so to speak!!
----- Original Message -----
From: <moparpjf@xxxx>
To: <laurence_g_johnson@xxxx>; <DAN300F@xxxx>;
<Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 7:23 AM
Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] 300F smog test


> In a message dated 8/25/2003 10:33:58 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> laurence_g_johnson@xxxx writes:
>
>
> > This serves to point out that the 60's high performance and muscle cars
> > weren't the big offenders with regard to air pollution. Their engines
were
> > fairly efficient and had good combustion characteristics, thats why they
> > made a lot of power. They took the rap while the real offenders were the
> > millions of six cylinders and low compression V-8's that powered grocery
> > getters and family sedans.
> >
> >
>
> New Jersey is getting closer and closer to California as far as
> emissions go, but I have refused to register my cars as historical because
if you
> do, the state only allows you 3,000 miles a year. I'm still not sure how
they
> can legally limit your dirving outside of the state, but they do.
>
> In any event, because I have regular plates, the cars have to pass
> inspection every year. While they do have somewhat lower standards for
older
> cars, both the G and the K go right through without a problem. I don't
know what
> the actual numbers are, but both cars have gone through without any
playing
> with the fuel system to make them lean. Of course, the G is still a
fairly new
> engine (maybe 6,000 miles) but the K engine has been around for a while.
I
> guess these things are better than we thought.
>
> Pete
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> For list server instructions, go to
http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>





Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network Archive Sitemap


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.