Now, just a minute. The "engine situation" for the 300F was clearly spelled out on the story board at the auction display. The original owner blew out the engine after the oil pan broke somehow probably a rock in 1962. The original restorer put in a 1959 engine. When we had the car judged in 99 by the 300 club, we found out the engine year was wrong. We put in a 1960 413 engine correctly date coded--close enough to the car production date--that it could have been right for that car. These dates we checked with Gil Cunningham and he advised that it was a possible date sequence. The engine was rebuilt to 300 specifications. So the car was authentic and totally correct to the build sheet. That was our goal and we displayed the build sheet and the 300 club code explanation sheet along with the receipt for the engine machining. I have heard that there was chatter going on about an incorrect engine. NOT SO. John Lyons mentioned it was New Yorker engine in an e-mail mentioned my near panic when the bidding just about died at $97K. We had told him it was a 413 and the story mentioned above so he went with New Yorker engine in his mail. That's not a problem with us and it was just a comment in passing from John not wanting to take the time or space to go on about the full story. So that might have been the source for the chatter. That is why I am taking the time to be fully clear. We were entirely forthcoming in our description about the car. We were excited and very pleased with the $152,500 price having decided that probably 150 was where it would end up. We advertised the car for three months with a color ad in Hemmings and on Hemmings web site and we put a picture ad in Old Cars Weekly. With that kind of publicity, the price obtained was/is the market price for that car at this time. There was a phone bidder and someone there on stage battling it out until the guy on stage gave up. Please receive this in a positive manner. I/we just want to be clear for the record. Technically, you could say the engine was/incorrect in that it isn't the engine that was in the car when it was produced. HOwever, it is a correct engine per date codes and letter car specifications. Let's be careful how we use the "incorrect" word. It has a negative, touchy connotation especially since we have been so clear and correct in our restoration and presentation of the car. Sending this on to the 300 club and for all to take note. Cheers and see you at the next 300 Meet???? Henry Hopkins/Richard Palmer ----- Original Message ----- From: "Neal Thomas" <mr300f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "chrysler 300 Club" <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 4:53 AM Subject: [Chrysler300] car > Hey, > > Check the pic, you never know what you'll find in a dark corner of your > house. > > That link you sent me was the year I prefer, 57, but I would take a 58. > The are close enough. That one is pretty rough but if you have time and > space it might be okay. I did seriously look at a Charger last summer, > I since have cooled on a car at this time but if the right one came > along you never know. > > The guys in the 300 club were on top of the 300's which is how I knew of > the 300F engine situation. > > You know a week from saturday is the cruise-in at Jerry's drive in. > It's free but they take donations sponsored by the Earth Angels. > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > To send a message to this group, send an email to: > Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > For list server instructions, go to > http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > To send a message to this group, send an email to: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/