I agree. While I never seen the 300C Handbook I am sure is it a very valuable tool for someone restoring a 300C. I often thought that a few members ( experts for each letter car, owners, restorers, concours judges ) should sit around or walk around a letter car and ,starting from the front, talk about everything little detail about the car. Get this all on video and from there a book can also be written. Also get lots of pictures. Instead of saying " That's not right " have pictures comparing what is correct and what's not correct. Perhaps this can be done at the Spring and Fall meets and at the Chryslers at Carlisle weekends. In time all of these experts for each letter car, owners, restorers, concours judges will be leaving us and all that knowledge will be gone. Our letter cars will then be restored in whatever manner they think it should look like and no one will know what is right and wrong. Lion Charlie Valentine 300G, 1962 300 Sport Convertible ----- Original Message ----- From: barjam300@xxxxxxx To: chesnutt@xxxxxxxxxxxx ; Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 9:28 PM Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: [Chrysler300] Re: Wayne Graefen Handbook and F's & G's To The Club, As a founding member of this group, I too want to Thank Wayne for taking the time to put the 300C Handbook together. Now that we have such a Great guideline to go by, it's high time a small group of you dedicated 300F & 300G owners, restorers and even our concours judges atttempt to match the excellent work done by Wayne and produce a guide on the revolutionary unibody 300's. While not the only expert on these two years, I think Dave Clelland would be a good representative to head this group up and give it some direction. I know this is not a new idea, but I thought I would put my two cents out there to see if I could get a project going that would benefit the Club for many years to come. 300'ly yours, Jim Bartuska Niles, Michigan In a message dated 3/14/2009 7:28:06 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, chesnutt@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes: Hi Wayne and others, I agree with Wayne Graefen, the Glo-Brite "CY3" and "CY4" tail light lenses are excellent quality. As many of us old timers remember, in 1977, our 300 Club, Int'l obtained a large supply of the Glo-Brite lenses and offered them to members of both 300 Clubs for $6.00 each. I still have mine that are wrapped in Chicago Tribune newspaper, dated Feb. 2, 1977. Our 300C still has the original Chrysler lenses -"CHRCH". I would like to thank Wayne Graefen for the wonderful "'57 Chrysler 300C Handbook" he published in October, 1995(Our copy). Every 300C owner should have one. John Chesnutt - 300C owner since July, 1958. -----Original Message----- From: _Chrysler300@Chrysler300@Chr_ (mailto:Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) [mailto:_Chrysler300@Chrysler300@Chr_ (mailto:Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) ] On Behalf Of Wayne Graefen Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 10:49 AM To: Ron Waters Cc: Intl 300 Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] Re: OEM vs. Glo-Brite Glo-Brite was not an OEM assembly line supplier. All the cars left the factory with "CHRCH" tail lamp lenses in them in '57 which had been supplied by Auto-Lite. A few years later (I have no idea how many years) Mopar parts started carrying the Glo-Brites in their packaging as replacements. For judging purposes any '57 Chrysler should have "CHRCH" lenses in it in my opinion and I have stated so in my C Handbook from its inception, however I will defer to the opinion of the Head Judge, Gil Cunningham, should he differ. Wayne G ----- Original Message ----- From: Ron Waters To: Wayne Graefen Cc: _chrysler300@chrysler300@chr_ (mailto:chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 12:40 PM Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] Re: OEM vs. Glo-Brite >They said the '57 Chrysler was the ONLY Chrysler specific tail lens they >had ever made though they had made numerous Plymouth and Dodge lenses. >Part of the reason they made it was that the factory supply of OEM lenses >from Auto-Lite was fairly quickly used up by Mopar service parts and they >were asked to supply Mopar and they did. This is why you will find >Glo-Brite "CY-3" and "CY-4" lenses in Mopar boxes with Mopar packaging. So based on this information, it sounds like Glo-Brite was a vendor for Chrysler and the CY-3/4 lenses would/should be considered OEM correct even by the club's concours standards. Any thoughts ? Ron [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ To send a message to this group, send an email to: _Chrysler300@Chrysler300@Chr_ (mailto:Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) For list server instructions, go to _http://www.chryslerhttp://www.chttp://wwwhttp://w_ (http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm) For archives go to _http://www.forwardlhttp://www.fhttp://www.fo_ (http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/Yahoo) ! Groups Links **************Need a job? Find employment help in your area. (http://yellowpages.aol.com/search?query=employment_agencies&ncid=emlcntusyelp00000005) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ To send a message to this group, send an email to: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm For archives go to http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:Chrysler300-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mailto:Chrysler300-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/