I use the computer;however,I do enjoy opening my mailbox,seeing my corospondence and being able to read it at my leisure,be it at work during breaks,doctors office,on the deck with a cup of coffee. Please continue mailing mine. Travis On 2/5/12, Ron Waters <ronbo97@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ed - > > That's why I included this suggestion in the text of my email: > >>Adding a question like this to the annual membership dues mailing >>would have assured a good number of respondents. > > Ron > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Edward Mills Antique Tractors > To: Ron Waters > Cc: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2012 10:16 PM > Subject: Re: Fw: [Chrysler300] E News and the proposals to go on line > only? > > > Hey guys - anyone who is replying to the question is obviously using a > computer - but there is no way to get a response from those not using a PC - > and I know in another club that I belong to - there are plenty of old timers > who are proud not to have a PC - so if you want to do a poll - it would seem > meaningless unless it is done by snail mail. best, Ed > > On 2/5/2012 8:53 PM, Ron Waters wrote: > > Earlier today, Tim Tomlin posted a response to my opinion that the club > consider going to an electronic format for the newsletter. > > Initially, I just sent a response to Tim. But I reconsidered and felt > that > it should be posted to the list. > > Ron > > > Hi Tim - > > > > Thanks for your feedback. It's important to hear everyone's opinion, > > especially folks that don't usually post on the list. > > > > My post was an attempt to express my opinion and 'test the waters' to > see > > how folks felt about the idea. There is no 'push' to change things > over. > > > > Regarding the gun club that you belong to, it seems that the > membership > > was not sufficiently polled before the decision was made to go > strictly > > on-line.Adding a question like this to the annual membership dues > mailing > > would have assured a good number of respondents. > > > > If you did get a significant number of folks saying, 'yeah, online is > fine > > for me', then subsequently half the club became inactive, then is that > the > > club's fault ? I suggest that it's the members' laziness instead. It's > no > > different than if they don't pick up their mail from the mailbox, then > > claim they didn't know about shoot schedules, meetings, etc. If it's > 'too > > onerous' for them to click a link on their desktop on in the browser, > then > > maybe they are not sufficiently interested in the club anymore. > > > > Just my 2 cents. > > > > Ron > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "tomlin" <tomlin@xxxxxxxxx> > > To: "Chrysler 300 club" <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2012 12:30 PM > > Subject: [Chrysler300] E News and the proposals to go on line only? > > > > > >> Gloria and others, > >> First, I think the new e-news is great. I wish to add now, before > >> things get out of hand, that I was dismayed to have the push made > already > >> to convert to a strictly electronic communiication for the club. I > whole > >> heartedly agree with Gloria's comments in this regard and wish to add > a > >> few before this thing gets too much of a life. > >> I belong to a small gun club of a little over 300 members. Several > >> years ago we went to strictly "on line" communications, with the > >> exception of the very few (fewer than a dozen) that took time to > request > >> continued mailings. We have now lost consistent contact with close to > >> half our membership despite the assurances that "most people are on > line" > >> in the modern age of electronics. It is amazing the numbers of > members > >> that don't know what is happening in their club for their benefit. > The > >> requirement to consciously go on line to find schedules for shoots or > >> other events seems to be too onerous for many. > >> It would also seem to be not feasible to go backwards and return to > >> mailings. The ones attending the meetings, now, and voicing opinions, > >> are those that go on line. The others are "left out" of the entire > >> process and seemingly are disaffected. They don't vote for officers, > >> they don't attend meetings as they don't know of their times, etc,. > What > >> a waste! > >> Tim Tomlinson > >> W. Central IL > >> > >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > >> > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------ > >> > >> To send a message to this group, send an email to: > >> Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx or > >> go to http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/join and select > the > >> "Leave Group" button > >> > >> For list server instructions, go to > >> http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm > >> > >> For archives go to > >> http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/search.htm#querylangYahoo! > Groups > >> Links > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > ------------------------------------ To send a message to this group, send an email to: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx or go to http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/join and select the "Leave Group" button For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm For archives go to http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/search.htm#querylangYahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: Chrysler300-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Chrysler300-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/