David: Great ?. My thoughts are that Chrysler liked the idea of having a halo car to draw buyers into the showrooms because it worked. This worked especially well in 1955-56 when the 300's were winning NASCAR races. Eventually, the positive effect of having a luxury performance car diminished and Chrysler figured out that they could sell a heck of a lot more high-performance Plymouths and Dodges than Chryslers. High insurance surcharges also did a job on mega motors. The performance concept always needed individuals and teams to push the idea past the bean counters that would resist production of cars that did not make good margin or lost money. Bob Rodger and the Ramchargers come to mind. It's all about making money and making cars. Creating and maintaining the brand is difficult and richly rewarding. The 300 brand is STILL selling cars and the concept of high-performance luxury cars is back, if only for high-rollers. It took the foreign car manufacturers to get high-performance luxury cars back in the Chrysler and Cadillac showrooms. It's been a long time since I've seen a hot-rod Lincoln. And, guess what-people come in to showrooms to look at the 392 Hemi engine in a Chrysler 300 SRT-8, go into sticker shock and drive off in a less expensive 300-the equivalent of the '50's & '60'sWindsors, Newports, Saratogas and New Yorkers. The concept and the brand still works 57 years later. Viva, tres cientos. Viva, Chrysler. Rich Barber (just celebrated the 57th birthday of our '55 C-300-born March 12, left the nursery March 17th.-should been green?) _____ From: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 5:56 AM To: A. Lance Espinosa Cc: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] Thursday night car show Funny as I was just looking at a friend's '62 Chevy Impala SS 409 4 speed last night. Looked up the production numbers for kicks and got to thinking how Mother Mopar was so "comfortable" making far lower production halo and performance vehicles back in the 1950s and 1960s. Curious if any 300 members know why Chrysler was willing/able to make so many low production vehicles then vs. Ford or GM? Different metrics? A higher level of customer focus? Other? David A. Morrison Sent via mobile On Mar 23, 2012, at 8:47 AM, "A. Lance Espinosa" <flmopar63@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:flmopar63%40yahoo.com> > wrote: > I run a car show every Thursday night. Last night I was telling some of the guys about my new 300s. > One of them is a Chevy guy. And called my 64 300K a K car ! > I was not happy. > So, I plaid it cool and asked him how many of his super rare Chevys they made. [20,000.] > Then I told him how many 62H htps were made and K convs. That was a shocker for him. > > Got the last of the brake parts I needed for the K. So I should have it yard driving soon ! Got to clean out the gas tank, ick. > They cant clean them out for you any more. Too bad ! > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ To send a message to this group, send an email to: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx or go to http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/join and select the "Leave Group" button For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm For archives go to http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/search.htm#querylangYahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: Chrysler300-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Chrysler300-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/