Hi Rich and Group,
The 62 and up torque converters and the cast iron TF converters are two
different animals. You can by rebuilt converters for the 62 and up just about
anywhere. The early ones require completely different tooling to rebuild. I
think that Chrysler Corp was the only manufacturer to have a converter designed
this way. The later units use a flex plate that is bolted to the crank shaft,
and the converter is bolted to this with 4 bolts. The front hub is also what
drives the front pump in the trans and rides in a bushing in the pump. The early
unit has a small bolt circle with studs that go through a flange on the
crankshaft, and are secured with nuts. Something like 8 or so. The other end has
a very short seal surface that only seals the converter hub. A drive sleeve
connects the converter to the front pump and has an O-ring on the converter
side, and a steel ring on the pump side. Lots more places to leak, and also one
of the causes for the drain back from the converter if they don’t seal fully. I
will try and put together a picture article for the next E-News, as it’s kind of
hard to explain in writing.
300ly,
Don Verity
From: Rich Barber
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 3:38 AM
Subject: [Chrysler300] 300F torque converter and remote
booster The shop that overhauled the TorqueFlite in our 1964 Chrysler 300K had
its __._,_.___ To send a message to this group, send an email to: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx or go to http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/join and select the "Leave Group" button For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm For archives go to http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/search.htm#querylang
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe __,_._,___ |