Re: [Chrysler300] Edelbrock vs. Carter AFB

Mark,

The AFB 3256 is the correct 1963 carb for the 413 non-HP engine (i.e. FirePower 340hp) used on the New Yorker and Imperial, and if I recall correctly your engine came out of a New Yorker. I also recall you used a fairly mild cam, and so the 3256 should be an ideal match to your engine. In other words, as I remember you did not build a “Firepower 360” HP engine which was the factory optional engine for the 300 Sport. From experience with three 1963 Imperials, I can say that the 3256 provides very good performance and economy (economy relative to 1963 expectations) when properly rebuilt. I see no need to go with an Edelbrock which is roughly equivalent to the Carter AVS but is built “generically” for a number of applications. The Edelbrock 1406 is the best match but will require a ‘68 and up style base plate on the air cleaner, or an aftermarket air cleaner, as well as possible rejetting and maybe a linkage adapter. Why bother when you have the correct carb? I recommend Jim McGowan in Rockford for rebuilding.

Carl Bilter

1963 consultant

From: mailto:Chrysler300-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 10:36 AM

To: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: [Chrysler300] Edelbrock vs. Carter AFB

Hi All,

I am running a single Carter AFB 3256SA on my ’63 Chrysler 300 Conv with a 413. I have heard a suggestion to “upgrade to new technology” and get one of the latest and greatest Edelbrock 4 barrel carbs. The 300 is completely stock and that is what I prefer, but if the performance and gas mileage would be improved, I may be willing to make the switch. The 413 was just rebuilt in the last 3 years and is running strong. Your comments are appreciated, especially a suggested Edelbrock model that would be similar to stock.

Regards,

Mark Lindahl

P.S. The 3256SA has been rebuilt by me. It runs well, but I am pretty sure it would run a bit better if it was professionally rebuilt.