Re: Aluminum vs. cast iron

[roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

My guess is The old stock 4barrel will be more on the torque side-smaller shorter plane.
I have my original 65 manifold on my HP383.  I love it. I use an edelbrock 650 cfm w it and a one inch spacer.   



 
------Original Message------
From: mikelj@xxxxxxx
To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
ReplyTo: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Mar 26, 2009 5:22 PM
Subject: Aluminum vs. cast iron




Any opinions out there about which 4 bbl. intakes would be better for a '64 383, the original cast iron ones or the newer design aluminum aftermarket types?

Mike in New Mexico
--
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 




Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 

This email was sent to: arc.6265@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

u/?bUrDWg.bSONJP.YXJjLjYy



?p=TEXFOOTER