Re: Cash for Clunkers

["MO ( Steve Mick)" <micher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

And as always, the bottom bird on thr totem pole gets all the crap from 
above!.............................MO
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ollie" <satellite1965@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 1:35 PM
Subject: Re: Cash for Clunkers


> Got a friend of mine that is in the scrap business.....he says that this 
> good gov deal has driven the price of scrap to a non-profit mode 
> again...another gov failure...But I am SURE they fix can bodies with a 
> health care plan..
> X%$#&*!
> Ollie
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <62pluckedchicken@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 10:29 AM
> Subject: RE: Cash for Clunkers
>
>
> > The people that want to destroy all automobiles prior to 1976 have no
> > sense of history or have no idea where our energy dollars are going, or
> > where energy comes from...
> >
> > we spend far more to heat and cool our houses than running automobiles,
> > yet the vast majority this "Clean" electricity we should be using comes
> > from oil and coal...
> >
> > should we rip down every house built prior to 1976? bet more than a few
> > people would have problems ripping down houses and buildings on the
> > National registry of historic places, even though they are "gas
> > Guzzlers"
> >
> > sorry about getting on my soap box ;)
> > Paul Lennemann wrote:
> > > There was a story yesterday on NPR's show "All Things Considered" about
> > > the 25 year cutoff in the cash for clunkers program.  The collector car
> > > hobbyists were credited with getting this inserted into the bill.  So to
> > >
> > > all of us who took the time to contact our representatives, it worked.
> > > In the story they were lamenting the fact that it leaves many cars on
> > > the road (nearly 5 million according to the reporter)without catalytic
> > > converters, gas guzzlers, etc.  As a regular listener of NPR I took the
> > > time to send an email and explain that many of these cars are driven
> > > very little and that a small percentage of them are used as daily
> > > driver.  I also pointed out that we need to have some around as parts
> > > cars to keep our collectibles in top condition.
> > > Here is a link to the story if anyone cares to listen or read the
> > > transcript:
> > > http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=111855811
> > >
> > > Paul L.
> > > '63 Sport Fury
> > > 440/727
> > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/ml-lennemann63.html
> >
> >
> > ----
> > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --  
> > directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and 
> > negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended 
> > recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will 
> > protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the 
> > content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> >
> > '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.
>
>
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --  
> directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and 
> negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended 
> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect 
> your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content 
> signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
>
> '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.