RE: Need some 727 assistance - 1965 specifics
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Need some 727 assistance - 1965 specifics



John,
	The break is generally between 1965 and 1966, for the overwhelming
majority.  There are some documented 1966 A-Bodies with 1965 parts that were
built out early in the 1966 model year.

	The 1965 727 B and C Body transmissions (popular for B-Body
applications) will be readily identified as having all of the following
features...

1.  Cast aluminum case. 

2.  13/16" cable shift hole above the driver's side front corner of the
transmission oil pan rail.  The hole may have a cable in it, and may or may
not have a 2" diameter cable adjusting flange with a 5/16"-18 lock bolt.

3.  5 bolt cover on the bottom of the tailshaft housing with a 15/32" hole
(or a cable) facing the driver's side of the car.  If the cover is missing,
you will be able to see the 5 holes, the irregularly shaped gasket surface,
and the internal workings of the park lock assembly.  (Note:  Removing the 5
bolt cover with the cable installed can result in damaged parts).

4.  The slip-spline output shaft.  Earlier 727 transmissions will have a
round flange that mates to the ball and trunnion joint.  Imperial
transmissions of this vintage will have a companion flange that accepts a
u-joint, the flange looking much like the one on most rear axles.  Threads
on the end of the output shaft indicate one of these transmissions with the
mating flange removed.  Almost any slip-spline transmission without features
1 and 2 is a '66-later piece.

SC

	 

-----Original Message-----
From: John Hammond [mailto:426_maxwedge@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 9:09 PM
To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Need some 727 assistance - 1965 specifics


Doug,  if you could forward pictures that would be very helpful... I have
the thing out where it's easy to inspect but it's been so long since I've
seen a pushbutton type out I've kinda forgotten.  I realize the splined
output shaft is a given but that really doesn't narrow it down much since
everything I've got has splines.  Is there a casting or model number on it
some- where as well - that could be used as a cross reference?  I've often
noticed a lot of transmission parts seem to use 1967 as some sort of
timeline/parts distinction what's the significance or change that occured
then?  Thanks so much for your help thus far...........
John Hammond


----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug Daniel" <dougdaniel50@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 5:56 AM
Subject: Re: Need some 727 assistance - 1965 specifics


all in all it needs too be rebuilt because it has sat  so long,they are hard

too find but not impossible,i have at least 3 ,,,do you need pictures too be

sure of yours or demensions ?

--- On Tue, 9/22/09, John Hammond <426_maxwedge@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: John Hammond <426_maxwedge@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Need some 727 assistance - 1965 specifics
> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Tuesday, September 22, 2009, 2:04 AM
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: John
> Hammond 426_maxwedge@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 22
> Subject: Identifing a 1965 Torqueflite
> >
> Guys, I hope some of you out there can help me with
> this: Many years ago I bought a 727
> (bigblock case I think),
> from a older fellow that ran a classics junkyard, (50's to
> early 70's stuff). Inside his building he had this 727
> that had
> been removed decades earlier and stored inside because of
> it's relative scarcity... so far so good. I've had the the
> part
> for years, stored indoors along with it's included torque
> convertor still in place. Recently some bills have
> come due and
> I have a potential buyer for the 727 if it is in fact what
> I bought it to be - a 1965 BigBlock cased torqueflite.
> I can't/won't
> sell it to the buyer if it isn't what he needs but I really
> don't know what to look for to positve ID it as such.
> I know the
> buyer will go through it before use due to it's age and
> lack of history but I also would appreciate any info
> imparted that
> would allow me to offer it to him at a fair market value.
> Please chime in on this one guys, this would probably be
> some
> good information to have for everybody on here.
> Thanks in advance to all that respond......
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> John Hammond
>
> > '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> >
> >
>
>
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one
> person -- directly to that person. I.e., send
> parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other
> personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the
> Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your
> privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the
> content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
>
> '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.
>
>
>


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations
as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to
the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy,
reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar
topic.  Thanks!

'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 
















Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.