Re: HOLY $#@&
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: HOLY $#@&



Original altered wheelbase car's k-frames were stainless. This k-frame would only approach that kind of value to someone that is restoring an original car that's missing the k-frame. That's just the person that Eddy's hoping for. He always wants high prices for his stuff. He's not tryin' to make a livin', he's tryin' to make a killin'!

Hammer


--- On Mon, 4/19/10, Donnie Schanz Jr <dcs426@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Donnie Schanz Jr <dcs426@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: HOLY $#@&
> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Monday, April 19, 2010, 2:43 PM
> 
> I saw a magnesium in Jim Kramers basement 15 years ago. He
> wanted 5 grand or more then. I do not believe this is
> stainless at 17 pounds, it is mag, or aluminum. If it is
> stainless, it is made from very thin steel. Jim Kramer would
> be the one to ask, he knows how many were made and what all
> materials were used. Unless you have one of the factory
> altereds or A-990 cars, you would be crazy to drop that kind
> of $$$ and actually use it. If you wanted it as an
> investment, maybe, but a risky investment it would be. Very
> limited market for this. Too limited for E-bay. He should
> know who he can sell this to and who not in my opinion. Dont
> you think?
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "William Harrison"
> <bbjt3@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 2:30 PM
> Subject: Re: HOLY $#@&
> 
> 
> I worked with steel products for 30 years and it doesn't
> look like aluminum. It looks like stainless but I question
> if it is 17 pounds.
> Stainless is lighter, but not that much lighter.
> Later
> Bill
> 
> 
> --- On Mon, 4/19/10, Dave64 <lt7dave@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> 
> > From: Dave64 <lt7dave@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: HOLY $#@&
> > To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Date: Monday, April 19, 2010, 2:24 PM
> > That weight sounds more like
> > aluminum.
> > 
> > --- On Mon, 4/19/10, Bill <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > > From: Bill <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Subject: Re: HOLY $#@&
> > > To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > Date: Monday, April 19, 2010, 1:17 PM
> > >
> > > and would stainless steel be THAT much lighter so
> that
> > it
> > > weighs only
> > > 17 pounds? That doesn't really make sense to me.
> > >
> > > -- > Bill M
> > > 65 Coronet 500 'vert http://1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/mmo62008.html
> > > 73 Dart Sport, 00 Cherokee Sport, 01 Dakota SLT
> > > 21 Model T Depot Hack, 92 Accord, 06 Mazda 3
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 2:15 PM, William
> Harrison
> > <bbjt3@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Man on Man is he ever proud of this
> piece..With
> > no
> > > documentation is it worth what he is asking and
> with
> > > documentation is it worth what he is asking.
> > > > Even if I had a spare 15 grand, I wouldn't
> buy
> > it, I
> > > would have one made.
> > > >
> > > > Bill Harrison
> > > > 65 Coronet 2 dr post
> > > >
> > > > --- On Mon, 4/19/10, Bill <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> From: Bill <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > >> Subject: HOLY $#@&
> > > >> To:
> > > >> Date: Monday, April 19, 2010, 11:57 AM
> > > >>
> > > >> http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1965-426-Race-Hemi-Factory-Altered-Wheel-Base-K-Frame_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQhashZitem4395825ecdQQitemZ290271157965QQptZMotorsQ5fCarQ5fTruckQ5fPartsQ5fAccessories
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > ----
> > > Please address private mail -- mail of interest
> to
> > only one
> > > person -- directly to that person. I.e., send
> > > parts/car transactions and negotiations as well
> as
> > other
> > > personal messages only to the intended recipient,
> not
> > to the
> > > Clubhouse public address. This practice will
> protect
> > your
> > > privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine
> tune
> > the
> > > content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
> > >
> > > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion
> Guidelines:
> > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one
> person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send
> parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other
> personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the
> Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your
> privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the
> content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> 
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> 
> 
> 





Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.