From: Donnie Schanz Jr <dcs426@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: HOLY $#@&
To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Monday, April 19, 2010, 2:43 PM
I saw a magnesium in Jim Kramers basement 15 years ago. He
wanted 5 grand or more then. I do not believe this is
stainless at 17 pounds, it is mag, or aluminum. If it is
stainless, it is made from very thin steel. Jim Kramer would
be the one to ask, he knows how many were made and what all
materials were used. Unless you have one of the factory
altereds or A-990 cars, you would be crazy to drop that kind
of $$$ and actually use it. If you wanted it as an
investment, maybe, but a risky investment it would be. Very
limited market for this. Too limited for E-bay. He should
know who he can sell this to and who not in my opinion. Dont
you think?
----- Original Message ----- From: "William Harrison"
<bbjt3@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: HOLY $#@&
I worked with steel products for 30 years and it doesn't
look like aluminum. It looks like stainless but I question
if it is 17 pounds.
Stainless is lighter, but not that much lighter.
Later
Bill
--- On Mon, 4/19/10, Dave64 <lt7dave@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> From: Dave64 <lt7dave@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: HOLY $#@&
> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Monday, April 19, 2010, 2:24 PM
> That weight sounds more like
> aluminum.
>
> --- On Mon, 4/19/10, Bill <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> > From: Bill <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: HOLY $#@&
> > To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Date: Monday, April 19, 2010, 1:17 PM
> >
> > and would stainless steel be THAT much lighter so
that
> it
> > weighs only
> > 17 pounds? That doesn't really make sense to me.
> >
> > -- > Bill M
> > 65 Coronet 500 'vert http://1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/mmo62008.html
> > 73 Dart Sport, 00 Cherokee Sport, 01 Dakota SLT
> > 21 Model T Depot Hack, 92 Accord, 06 Mazda 3
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 2:15 PM, William
Harrison
> <bbjt3@xxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > > Man on Man is he ever proud of this
piece..With
> no
> > documentation is it worth what he is asking and
with
> > documentation is it worth what he is asking.
> > > Even if I had a spare 15 grand, I wouldn't
buy
> it, I
> > would have one made.
> > >
> > > Bill Harrison
> > > 65 Coronet 2 dr post
> > >
> > > --- On Mon, 4/19/10, Bill <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> From: Bill <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >> Subject: HOLY $#@&
> > >> To:
> > >> Date: Monday, April 19, 2010, 11:57 AM
> > >>
> > >> http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1965-426-Race-Hemi-Factory-Altered-Wheel-Base-K-Frame_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQhashZitem4395825ecdQQitemZ290271157965QQptZMotorsQ5fCarQ5fTruckQ5fPartsQ5fAccessories
> > >>
> >
> >
> > ----
> > Please address private mail -- mail of interest
to
> only one
> > person -- directly to that person. I.e., send
> > parts/car transactions and negotiations as well
as
> other
> > personal messages only to the intended recipient,
not
> to the
> > Clubhouse public address. This practice will
protect
> your
> > privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine
tune
> the
> > content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
> >
> > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion
Guidelines:
> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one
person -- directly to that person. I.e., send
parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other
personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the
Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your
privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the
content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network