Re: WD-40 Versus the World of Lubricants

["MO ( Steve Mick)" <micher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Gibbs penetrant---interesting stuff, I want to try it.  The only thing I 
don't like about PB blaster is, it doesn't stay liquid long enough to really 
soak in. Got to re- apply it often.  WD 40? --only use it on piddly stuff 
cause it is cheap or on sale. Wal Mart has some stuff similar but even 
cheaper.  I don't mind using to much and wasting it :-)  ................MO
{Steve Mick}
http://stevemick.shutterfly.com/pictures#Part%202
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Afterhours Fabrication" <afterhoursfab@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 1:18 PM
Subject: Re: WD-40 Versus the World of Lubricants


${top_text_ad}
Thanks for the link Gary. I had higher hopes for the article,
expecting to see real world tests against other products. Instead it
was more of a opinion based article (although those are some pretty
valid opinions..) The tranny fluid and acetone is something new, maybe
I'll try that in the future.

Another "cure-all" product that caught my eye recently is the Gibbs
Brand penetrant. The people that use it swear by it, and it certainly
has some interesting features. I haven't tried it yet, but you can
learn about it here:

http://www.roadsters.com/gibbs/

- Dave


On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Gary H. <spigot2039@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Since we typically face rusted part removal etc. I though this article 
> comparing WD-40 to so others was interesting.
>
> For shops or home-brewers, the article claims for breaking corrosion 
> "automatic transmission fluid combined 1:1 with acetone...can be as much 
> as four times—repeat, four times—as effective as any other product."
>
> http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/how-to/products/wd-40-vs-the-world-of-lubricants
>
> Thanks,
> Gary H.
>
>
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --  
> directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and 
> negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended 
> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect 
> your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content 
> signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
>
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and 
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.

${bottom_text_ad}
----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --  
directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations 
as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to 
the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, 
reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar 
topic.  Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and 
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. 

This email was sent to: arc.6265@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

u/?bUrDWg.bSONJP.YXJjLjYy



?p=TEXFOOTER