The Forward Look Network | ||
| ||
Forwardlooks in old pictures/postcards Jump to page : < ... 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 ... > Now viewing page 239 [50 messages per page] | View previous thread :: View next thread |
Forward Look NON-Technical Discussions -> 1955-1961 Forward Look MoPar General Discussion | Message format |
jimntempe |
| ||
Expert Posts: 2312 Location: Arizona | no and don't ever make me look at that again... | ||
wizard |
| ||
Board Moderator & Exner Expert 10K+ Posts: 13050 Location: Southern Sweden - Sturkö island | No Doc, this is a normal family | ||
58 DESOTOS RULE |
| ||
Expert Posts: 2308 Location: The Bat Cave, Fairborn, OH | The Marilyn Monroe pictures appear to show her sitting in a 1960-61 Chrysler convertible in spite of the original poster saying that she wasn't sitting in a FL car. Yet if you blow up the picture that has the driver's door open, it certainly seems as if that's an Astrodome instrument cluster. I agree though with the OP that any picture of Marilyn Monroe is worth posting no matter the subject as she was such an attractive woman. (Marilyn Monroe FL.jpg) Attachments ---------------- Marilyn Monroe FL.jpg (22KB - 244 downloads) | ||
wizard |
| ||
Board Moderator & Exner Expert 10K+ Posts: 13050 Location: Southern Sweden - Sturkö island | No, it's a '62 300H, very rare with only 123 produced | ||
Chrycoman |
| ||
Expert Posts: 1819 Location: Vancouver, BC | The Astrodome was used on 1960-1962 Chryslers, so you can't tell by blowing up Marilyn's legs. Now, if you look at the two photos that do not show her legs, you can see the car with the door closed. And the fact that the car is finless. Thus a 1962 model. I'm another one who likes to view the 1962 Chrysler as a Forward Look car. After all, the only the rear quarter panels and taillamps were new with the rest of the car actually a 1961 Dodge Polara with a 1960-61 Chrysler instrument panel and the 1961 Chrysler front clip. Also, the 1962 Chrysler was designed under Virgil Exner. (mm2.jpg) Attachments ---------------- mm2.jpg (93KB - 234 downloads) | ||
mstrug |
| ||
Expert 5K+ Posts: 6500 Location: Newark, Texas (Fort Worth) | I agree, look at the windshield and vent window assembly. It dates back to 1957 on Imperials and convertibles. (57plyconvred1.jpg) (57plyconvred2.jpg) Attachments ---------------- 57plyconvred1.jpg (11KB - 228 downloads) 57plyconvred2.jpg (50KB - 230 downloads) | ||
Islander 62 |
| ||
Veteran Posts: 142 Location: Victoria, Vancouver Island, BC Canada | Chrycoman - 2015-11-15 1:10 AM The Astrodome was used on 1960-1962 Chryslers, so you can't tell by blowing up Marilyn's legs. Now, if you look at the two photos that do not show her legs, you can see the car with the door closed. And the fact that the car is finless. Thus a 1962 model. I'm another one who likes to view the 1962 Chrysler as a Forward Look car. After all, the only the rear quarter panels and taillamps were new with the rest of the car actually a 1961 Dodge Polara with a 1960-61 Chrysler instrument panel and the 1961 Chrysler front clip. Also, the 1962 Chrysler was designed under Virgil Exner. You're right, I owned a white 'H' convertible over 30 years ago and this is one that I have known about for as many years. MM did a huge photo shoot in this 'H' and it's really well known. As for the question of wether or not the '62's are FL cars, as far as I'm concerned, they are, no one but Virgil could be responsible for such a stunning design. Exner has his mark all over the '62's......I have a few '62's as well as a '58 Imperial and they're both FL from start to finish. | ||
Doctor DeSoto |
| ||
Location: Parts Unknown | They are Forward Look cars right up to the blunted sheetmetal purposely made to cover up the genuinely Forward Look fins. To overlook this is to not acknowledge just how integral the fins were to Exner's run at Chrysler Corp. Just because it has bread and mayo does not a pastrami sandwich make. | ||
Viper Guy |
| ||
Expert Posts: 2003 Location: Branson, MO | The '55s didn't have fins nor did the '61 Plymouth and they are in the FL category. I personally think the '62s that were carried over from the same FL bodies of their prior year should be considered FL's. Just my opinion - and as everyone knows, we all have 'em. "It's delightful, it's delovely, it's DeSoto" Edited by Viper Guy 2015-11-16 12:09 AM | ||
Doctor DeSoto |
| ||
Location: Parts Unknown | What 61 did not have fins ? Just because they were vertical doesn't make them not fins. Granted, they are different, but they aren't purposefully designed nubs like the 62 big body cars got. Besides, Exner himself is the one quoted as disliking what they had done to his design/s. If Ex don't claim it or like it, I'd say there is no higher authority on what is and is not a Forward Look car. | ||
Chrycoman |
| ||
Expert Posts: 1819 Location: Vancouver, BC | The 1961 Plymouth had no fins. Although it came close . . . Neither did the first year of the Forward Look - 1955. The 1962 Imperial used the 1961 design with the fins removed and was the last year for the "sparrow strainer" taillamps, which in 1962 was an update of the original 1955 style. I have always wondered about Exner's comment on the 1962 Chryslers. He was the man in charge, and the rear quarters were the result of having to use the rear doors of the 1961 Polara with its character crease 2/3's of the way down the door. The styling people were wondering how they could use the door and have it blend in with the rear quarter panel. Now, if you want to see a real plucked chicken, check out Exner's initial designs for the 1962 Chrysler and DeSoto. As wrth the previous years, DeSoto and Chrysler shared rear quarter panels and used the taillamps as the way to make the cars look different. The Valiants, Lancers, 1962 Plymouth and 1962 Dodge Dart/Polara are definitely not Forward Look and were based on Exner's ideas for what was to follow the Forward Look. Even the instrument panels of the 1962 Chrysler, Dodge Custom 880, and 1962 Imperial were basically the 1961 designs (1960 in the case of Chrysler and Dodge) carried forward one more year. The designs used on Valiants, Lancers, and the 1962 Plymouth and Dodges Dart/Polara had a panel that was set away from the passengers with the instruments in a box placed in front of the driver. The same panel would be used on the 1963 Plymouths and Dodges while the new Valiants and Darts adopted a more mainstream design that was pleasant, but boring. (1961 Plymouth Fury - Rejected.jpg) Attachments ---------------- 1961 Plymouth Fury - Rejected.jpg (97KB - 233 downloads) | ||
hemidave |
| ||
Expert Posts: 4654 | Plymouth (10336800_682015115179341_3736530299988143690_n.jpg) Attachments ---------------- 10336800_682015115179341_3736530299988143690_n.jpg (207KB - 236 downloads) | ||
Doctor DeSoto |
| ||
Location: Parts Unknown | OK, FOMOCO people, ... what's the deal with the elliptical tail lights on the Merc ? I have only see round ones like what Comets wore. | ||
58coupe |
| ||
Expert Posts: 1740 Location: Alaska | OK Doc were you sleeping in 1962? I believe that is a 62 Merc full size car and that's the style tail lights they wore. | ||
RDP |
| ||
Elite Veteran Posts: 1049 Location: PL / EU | I'm not a Ford man, but I believe that it is canadian Meteor | ||
Chrycoman |
| ||
Expert Posts: 1819 Location: Vancouver, BC | That's actually a 1961 Mercury Meteor 600 2 door sedan, a model sold only in the U.S. The 1960 Mercury came as Monterey, Montclair and Park Lane, all on a 126" wheelbase. For 1961 the line was slashed, dropping the upper two lines and placing the Monterey on a 120" wheelbase with the Ford Galaxie body. Mercury was adding the new mid-size Meteor in 1962 and decided to offer two lower-priced full size models - Meteor 600 and Meteor 800. Both had Ford's six cylinder as standard with a choice of three optional V8 engines. The Meteor 800 sedans and hardtops used the Thunderbird roof line as used on the Monterey but the Meteor 600 sedans used a large wraparound rear window as used on the 1960 Ford Fairlane and Fairlane 500 series. The Meteor 600 also offered the Commuter wagon. The 1961 Mercury Meteor 600 used the elliptical taillights while the Meteor 800 used the Monterey round ones. The Mercury Meteor 600/800 were not available in Canada as Canadian Mercury-Meteor dealers had the Ford-based Meteor to sell. | ||
59 explorer |
| ||
Extreme Veteran Posts: 384 Location: Hershey PA | It is a 1961 Meteor 600. In 61 Mercury inched closer to Ford dropping the Park Lane and Montclair series making the Monterey the top of the line with the Meteor 800 and Meteor 600 behind. The 600 is obviously based on the entry level Ford and I believe it was available with a 6 | ||
Chrycoman |
| ||
Expert Posts: 1819 Location: Vancouver, BC | The Canadian 1961 Meteor. It was replaced by the new intermediate Mercury Meteor for 1962-63, and reappeared in 1964 as just Meteor using the Mercury body with Ford instrument panels and interiors. (1961 Meteor Montcalm 4dr Hardtop 1.jpg) (1961 Meteor Rideau 500 4dr Sedan 1.jpg) Attachments ---------------- 1961 Meteor Montcalm 4dr Hardtop 1.jpg (54KB - 231 downloads) 1961 Meteor Rideau 500 4dr Sedan 1.jpg (129KB - 231 downloads) | ||
Valiant_200 |
| ||
Veteran Posts: 124 | Chrycoman - 2015-11-16 2:16 AM The Valiants, Lancers, 1962 Plymouth and 1962 Dodge Dart/Polara are definitely not Forward Look and were based on Exner's ideas for what was to follow the Forward Look. I disagree. I believe that 60-62 Valiants are very much Forward Look. | ||
1960fury |
| ||
Expert 5K+ Posts: 7402 Location: northern germany | Valiant_200 - 2015-11-17 3:45 AM I disagree. I believe that 60-62 Valiants are very much Forward Look. what makes you think so? they do not follow the late 50s fashion in car design at all. they look as if they were 60s eastern bloc cars or fiats. very "european", very anti jetson/american. if you like them, fine, tastes are different but these are really not forwardlook. | ||
hemidave |
| ||
Expert Posts: 4654 | Desoto and Plymouth (57 DeSoto.jpg) (57 Ply.jpg) Attachments ---------------- 57 DeSoto.jpg (324KB - 230 downloads) 57 Ply.jpg (342KB - 217 downloads) | ||
1960fury |
| ||
Expert 5K+ Posts: 7402 Location: northern germany | . (ozzie61.jpg) (ail_570xN.698665327_k3is.jpg) Attachments ---------------- ozzie61.jpg (32KB - 217 downloads) ail_570xN.698665327_k3is.jpg (66KB - 213 downloads) | ||
wizard |
| ||
Board Moderator & Exner Expert 10K+ Posts: 13050 Location: Southern Sweden - Sturkö island | Very nice pictures guys, thanks' for sharing! | ||
Valiant_200 |
| ||
Veteran Posts: 124 | 1960fury - 2015-11-17 7:12 AM Valiant_200 - 2015-11-17 3:45 AM I disagree. I believe that 60-62 Valiants are very much Forward Look. what makes you think so? they do not follow the late 50s fashion in car design at all. they look as if they were 60s eastern bloc cars or fiats. very "european", very anti jetson/american. if you like them, fine, tastes are different but these are really not forwardlook. Let's consider the evidence: -Design for the Valiant began in 57, in the midst of Forward Look mania. -Virgil Exner was deeply involved in the design of the Valiant. -The front clip of the 60-62 series Valiant borrows heavily from the 57 Chrysler 300c -They were sold at Plymouth dealerships, right alongside other Forward Look cars. -The factory original aluminum keys for the 60-62 Valiants have a Forward Look logo stamped in the heads. -The Forward Look logo appears on nearly every part that was cast for them. From the windows, where it is nicely etched in a corner of each pane, to the cover for the park pawl on the transmission. The appearance of the Forward Look logo is one of the things I love about these cars. -The 60-61 Valiants sported a large "toilet seat" fake spare tire on the trunk lid, like numerous years of Imperial and Plymouth. Before I make the next observation, allow me to quote one of my favorite commenters on this board. A man for whom I have great respect as one who appreciated these cars long before they were cool, Dr. DeSoto: "What 61 did not have fins ? Just because they were vertical doesn't make them not fins. Granted, they are different, but they aren't purposefully designed nubs like the 62 big body cars got." With that declaration on the record, I hereby declare the 60-62 Valiants to be finned! Granted, in 62 they deleted those gorgeous cat-eye tail lights in favor of a pair of distinctly GM looking rounds, but the fins remained! Take that, rest of 62 MoPar lineup! Here's one more point to ponder. Valiant carried the vestiges of fins longer than any other Chrysler product, all the way through the 66 model year. 63-64 had fairly tall stumps, which were shortened for 65-66. | ||
1960fury |
| ||
Expert 5K+ Posts: 7402 Location: northern germany | Valiant_200 - 2015-11-17 1:10 PM Let's consider the evidence: -Design for the Valiant began in 57, in the midst of Forward Look mania. -Virgil Exner was deeply involved in the design of the Valiant. -The front clip of the 60-62 series Valiant borrows heavily from the 57 Chrysler 300c -They were sold at Plymouth dealerships, right alongside other Forward Look cars. -The factory original aluminum keys for the 60-62 Valiants have a Forward Look logo stamped in the heads. -The Forward Look logo appears on nearly every part that was cast for them. From the windows, where it is nicely etched in a corner of each pane, to the cover for the park pawl on the transmission. The appearance of the Forward Look logo is one of the things I love about these cars. -The 60-61 Valiants sported a large "toilet seat" fake spare tire on the trunk lid, like numerous years of Imperial and Plymouth. so these "evidence", completely unrelated to the actual shape an proportion of the cars, makes them boxy valiants fl? so every car that has a ridiculous fake spare tire is a fl? i bought some nos oe trim parts for my 60 some time ago in pentastar boxes. so? a simple logo does not change a design concept. if you print a fl logo on a yugo it does not become a fl. Edited by 1960fury 2015-11-17 1:32 PM | ||
wizard |
| ||
Board Moderator & Exner Expert 10K+ Posts: 13050 Location: Southern Sweden - Sturkö island | Well, Virgil Exner patented the complete Valiant design in June 13 1961. "1960 Valiant. All of Exner's styling themes were apparant on the Valiant; sculpted body, fully open wheelarches, large greenhouse, long hood and short deck and the ubiquitous trash can spare wheel stamp on the trunk" As early as 1957, Chrysler had been thinking about building a compact, and by May 1958 had set up the Small Car Study Program, headed by Harry Chesebrough, to develop a car ready for release in 1962....... In a Product planning meeting held on 8th July 1958, Chesebrough and Ex showed two full size clay models, one with a wheelbase of 106in and the other with a 103in base, both wearing Falcon nameplates. The text above is exerptions from the book Virgil Exner Visioneer by Peter Grist. Obviously, the Valiant was planned and designed in the midst of the FL era for to be presented 1962, but was released already in 1960. Forward Look or not?? | ||
1960fury |
| ||
Expert 5K+ Posts: 7402 Location: northern germany | wizard - 2015-11-17 2:14 PM Forward Look or not?? its just a marketing slogan. a 59 buick or 57 lincoln premiere is as much "forwardlook" as a 60 plymouth or chrysler. FACT is design wise valiants have NOTHING in common with the typical late 50s long and low rocketship design. i remember when my ex girfriend (desotogirl ) saw the valiant for the 1rst time, she couldn't believe its a mopar. she said, in disgust, that looks like a eastern bloc car and she was right. i remember the retired ex chrysler designer (that worked under exner, forgot his name) saying here that the valiant was the ONLY car exner designed all by his own. still that does not change the look of the car. | ||
1960fury |
| ||
Expert 5K+ Posts: 7402 Location: northern germany | . (0_i35_riverside_may_1957.jpg) (0sams.jpg) (059.jpg) Attachments ---------------- 0_i35_riverside_may_1957.jpg (146KB - 209 downloads) 0sams.jpg (89KB - 219 downloads) 059.jpg (153KB - 227 downloads) | ||
wizard |
| ||
Board Moderator & Exner Expert 10K+ Posts: 13050 Location: Southern Sweden - Sturkö island | Well Sid, there's a reason why we call them "toads" There was a time when those cars hurt my eyes, but with time and the "modern" deigned cars all looking like suppositorys, I like them more. There's the leaning Tower of Power, a pushbutton transmission and actually space inside. I could think of having a Valiant as winter car, butwith a Suregrip rear axle | ||
1960fury |
| ||
Expert 5K+ Posts: 7402 Location: northern germany | these were good cars! few people know the 60 "hi per packs" went from 0-60 in 6 seconds. yet they are so ugly i wouldn't touch them. i prefer the later valiants. in 1960 mercury showed with the comet that you can build compact cars that look nice. | ||
sidesho_bob1961 |
| ||
Expert Posts: 1728 Location: Fleetwood, Pa | Lets not bring up Mercurys.....they have nothing to do with FL Mopars..... | ||
christine-lover |
| ||
Expert Posts: 2996 Location: Sept. 1958 | 59 Desoto (image.jpg) Attachments ---------------- image.jpg (78KB - 222 downloads) | ||
hemidave |
| ||
Expert Posts: 4654 | On Girard Ave at Broad St Philadelphia PA 1964 (Philadelphia PA 1964.jpg) Attachments ---------------- Philadelphia PA 1964.jpg (397KB - 219 downloads) | ||
RDP |
| ||
Elite Veteran Posts: 1049 Location: PL / EU | Dodge (55-1.jpg) Attachments ---------------- 55-1.jpg (128KB - 211 downloads) | ||
soiouz |
| ||
Expert Posts: 3480 Location: Montreal, Canada | "You Auto Buy Now" campaign, 1958. (h157-1.jpg) (h157-5.jpg) Attachments ---------------- h157-1.jpg (75KB - 198 downloads) h157-5.jpg (86KB - 208 downloads) | ||
mstrug |
| ||
Expert 5K+ Posts: 6500 Location: Newark, Texas (Fort Worth) | 1957 Plymouth on a hauler: (57plyonhaulerbandw.jpg) Attachments ---------------- 57plyonhaulerbandw.jpg (268KB - 211 downloads) | ||
Peter Panov |
| ||
Veteran Posts: 188 | Yes spinout you are right! I've not seen these cars in Bulgaria. I've seen these cars in the US, during my visits there. We both know 2-dr HT and the convertibles are the most attractive and this is what I used to see most. I only wanted to point that I regret that not too many of the middle and cheaper versions survived nowadays, because they give a better idea what was more common as transportation in those days. Regards Edited by Peter Panov 2015-11-19 9:15 AM | ||
mstrug |
| ||
Expert 5K+ Posts: 6500 Location: Newark, Texas (Fort Worth) | 1957 on Cannon Beach Ore. (57plymouthbeach.jpg) Attachments ---------------- 57plymouthbeach.jpg (155KB - 208 downloads) | ||
hemidave |
| ||
Expert Posts: 4654 | 57 Plymouth (57 Plymouth.jpg) Attachments ---------------- 57 Plymouth.jpg (334KB - 202 downloads) | ||
mstrug |
| ||
Expert 5K+ Posts: 6500 Location: Newark, Texas (Fort Worth) | He doesn't seem very happy with his purchase. Marc. Edited by mstrug 2015-11-19 1:01 PM | ||
hemidave |
| ||
Expert Posts: 4654 | 61 Dodge (61 dod.jpg) Attachments ---------------- 61 dod.jpg (133KB - 210 downloads) | ||
hemidave |
| ||
Expert Posts: 4654 | Desoto wagon (DeSoto wagon.jpg) Attachments ---------------- DeSoto wagon.jpg (140KB - 201 downloads) | ||
soiouz |
| ||
Expert Posts: 3480 Location: Montreal, Canada | In Montreal, Quebec. (12239874_10153624344929543_6773712971643772013_n.jpg) Attachments ---------------- 12239874_10153624344929543_6773712971643772013_n.jpg (139KB - 201 downloads) | ||
60crossram |
| ||
Elite Veteran Posts: 836 Location: Layton, Utah | No, he's just thinking about the little girl taking the picture while he's sporting a wood. | ||
1960fury |
| ||
Expert 5K+ Posts: 7402 Location: northern germany | . Edited by 1960fury 2015-11-22 3:37 PM (0-ronan.mt.jpg) (0sams.jpg) (0-savannah.jpg) (61chicago.jpg) (bhhthen.JPG) (bhh.jpg) (culvercity1958.jpg) Attachments ---------------- 0-ronan.mt.jpg (59KB - 198 downloads) 0sams.jpg (89KB - 200 downloads) 0-savannah.jpg (369KB - 184 downloads) 61chicago.jpg (35KB - 196 downloads) bhhthen.JPG (177KB - 200 downloads) bhh.jpg (380KB - 203 downloads) culvercity1958.jpg (85KB - 200 downloads) | ||
hemidave |
| ||
Expert Posts: 4654 | September 1964 (55 Plymouth Sept 1964.jpg) Attachments ---------------- 55 Plymouth Sept 1964.jpg (344KB - 213 downloads) | ||
hemidave |
| ||
Expert Posts: 4654 | I'm posting these photos for our fellow member 59 explorer (bob.jpg) (bob2.jpg) (bob3.jpg) (bob4.jpg) (bob5.jpg) Attachments ---------------- bob.jpg (234KB - 195 downloads) bob2.jpg (113KB - 198 downloads) bob3.jpg (228KB - 192 downloads) bob4.jpg (149KB - 204 downloads) bob5.jpg (205KB - 203 downloads) | ||
hemidenis |
| ||
Expert Posts: 3888 Location: Northen Virginia | Miss Kennedy boarding Airforce one that sad day in Dallas, TX (20151122_193727.jpg) Attachments ---------------- 20151122_193727.jpg (91KB - 212 downloads) | ||
hemidave |
| ||
Expert Posts: 4654 | 55s (55 Chrysler.jpg) (55 Dodge.jpg) (55 DeSoto.jpg) Attachments ---------------- 55 Chrysler.jpg (143KB - 201 downloads) 55 Dodge.jpg (185KB - 211 downloads) 55 DeSoto.jpg (144KB - 202 downloads) | ||
hemidave |
| ||
Expert Posts: 4654 | Plymouth (1468567_496212223825412_395446426_n.jpg) Attachments ---------------- 1468567_496212223825412_395446426_n.jpg (157KB - 192 downloads) | ||
Jump to page : < ... 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 ... > Now viewing page 239 [50 messages per page] |
Search this forum Printer friendly version E-mail a link to this thread |
(Delete all cookies set by this site) | |