In my experience anyway, MOST Chrysler cars came with 3.23s
as the standard rear-end gear set. Our '64 Crown has them, and so does our
'72 Cuda. I would think the 2.94s would just make you have to push the peddle a
little further to the floor (more gas) to get things moving.
With the 3.23s, it will get going a little better (up hill too), but of of
course your top-end speed will be down a bit, is that
ok?
Setting up the axel is not "difficult", but it does require
attention to detail, particularly when setting the ring gear backlash and the
pinion depth. Read up on it, and make check of required tools. What
may (or maybe not) shock you is the price of a new limited-slip
differential for that axle. It won't make you move down the highway any
better, but may help in the snow, sand, or mud.
Bill & Tami Roddick '64 Imperial Crown '72 'Cuda 340 '88 Cherokee Laredo '95 Concorde From: mailing-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:mailing-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of kmoore12@xxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 4:22 AM To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: IML: 70 rear axle Hey everyone, I have an issue with my rear axle
that is tearing me up. I need to replace the bearings ( sounds like a church
choir in my trunk ) and I would like to install taller gears and a
limited-slip diff while I am in there. Here is my problem: I would like to go
from the current 2.94 to a 3.23 for a little extra "go" and better towing
capabilities. If my calculations are correct, that would be an increase of
approximately 200 rpm at 65 mph. Will that increase make my highway hauler not
so highway. My main goal with this car is road trips. And one last question: Is
rebuilding an axle difficult? I rebuilt my transmission myself ( with a little
help from my brother ) and that was easy.
Keith
P. S. I want to thank everyone for their support. I
was asking a few weeks ago if I should keep her or set her up for adoption. As
you can see, I am keeping the little
@!&^%$(&^...........
|