--- "A. Foster" <monkeypuzzle1@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Kenyon; > The Peugeot 403 was an intentional copy of a > Chrysler Airflow I'd heard about the Toyota, but the Peugeot was a new one and really jumped off the screen at me today. Learn something new every day and all... It's interesting that people think of the > Chrysler, DeSoto, and Imperial > Airflows as a failure. In a sales and marketing > sense they were when they > hit the market for 1934, but in an engineering sense > they weren't. I couldn't agree more, and after inspecting Jim Martin's before he sold it (yes, Jim, I did pine for it), I was VERY impressed with the car. After collecting the sales material that's posted to the website and reading it as I got it, I decided that I'd prefer to have a 1934 (over a 31-33) with the original waterfall grille (not the revised 1935 one that they gave to 1934 owners for free as a sop to complaints about the car's unconventional looks). Most of the material that I've read goes out of its way to trumpet how dismal and disappointing actual vs. projected sales figures were to Chrysler management, and especially in light of the sound logic that was used to justify the cars in the first place. > In fact within five years of the Airflow > coming out the entire > industry was marketing cars with that same potato > shape Couldn't agree more. It WAS an incredible feat and they were WAY ahead, and the repetition of Airflow themes in others' cars is proof that they were onto something back in 1929 when they started work on the cars: http://imperialclub.com/Articles/Trifon/index.htm http://imperialclub.com/Articles/Breer/index.htm Kenyon Wills ----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com ----------------- This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm