Re: IML: Back in 58 it was different, of course
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IML: Back in 58 it was different, of course
- From: RandalPark@xxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:05:36 -0400
In the late '50s and early '60s dealerships in major metropoliton areas were set up as either Imperial-Chrysler-Plymouth, or DeSoto-Dodge-Dodge Trucks. For a very short time, I believe that the later was DeSoto-Dodge-Valiant, but this changed quickly once the Valiant was added to the Plymouth line.
Paul W.
In an email dated 11/8/2005 8:38:02 am GMT Daylight time, "Hugh & Therese" <hugtrees@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>Our spirited discussion today led me to thinking, always a dangerous time,
>mainly for me. ?Anyhoo, back in 1958, Imperial production, at 16,133*, made
>it the 16th largest name plate. ? Plymouth, by comparison, made 443,799
>cars, at number three. ?Sales of all cars slumped in 1958. ?In 1957, by
>comparison, there were 37,593* Imperials built, but that was a peak year,
>with the introduction of the new body style. ?In 1959, the number went up
>slightly to 17, 269*.
>
>*Source: 100 Years Of The American Auto (Publications International, Ltd),
>2002
>
>The math becomes interesting if you break it down. ?At 16,133, there were,
>on average, 1,344 cars a month being sold. ?(A number of these cars would
>also have been sent abroad, particularly to Canada.) ?I am obliged to guess
>how many MOPAR dealerships there were in the entire USA at this time. ?As
>mentioned in a previous message, none of these was a dedicated Imperial
>dealership. ?My own 58 was purchased from a Plymouth dealership in a very
>small town some thirty miles from San Antonio, Texas ?Does 2,000 dealerships
>seem like an appropriate guess? ?That would be only 41 in each state,
>remembering that Alaska and Hawaii had yet to be formally designated as
>such. ?That seems a little low, but lets go with it anyway.
>
>That would means that each dealership would only have to sell 8 Imperials
>throughout the year to absorb the entire production run. ?Selling them was a
>bit of a pain. ?You might have one on the lot but more than likely all you'd
>have is a plastic model and a lot of sales materials stating trim levels,
>color combinations, materials and equipment. ?It also meant your repair shop
>would have to carry tools to work on the car and a certain amount of spare
>parts as well. ?I met a man who ran a Plymouth dealership in an even smaller
>Texas county town called Karnes City. ?He said that the Imperial was just a
>pain in the behind, in every respect. ?He wanted folks to buy what was on
>his lot, not have him fooling around on special orders that were complex in
>every respect.
>
>In passing, I don't know if you could buy an Imperial at any MOPAR outlet,
>such as Chrysler, Dodge, DeSoto and Plymouth. ?I have somehow come to hold
>the idea that Imperials were mainly sold at Plymouth dealerships but cannot
>recall upon what this supposition is based.
>
>Many features of the Imperial were also on the company's lesser name plates.
>The idea was that the press would talk up these features and then the
>salesmen would be able to sell the Plymouth on its close relationship with
>the Imperial, hence giving the owner a sense that he was getting some of the
>Imperial's prestige when he bought his Plymouth.
>
>The actual Imperial buyer would have quite a set of choices to make when he
>made his purchase. ?Only one engine and only four body styles narrowed the
>choice quickly but then you'd have to begin thinking about colors, and cloth
>or leather, and trim levels. ?I recently had the pleasure of seeing Patrick
>Moore's base model 58 Imperial. ?It was black outside, with a black cloth
>interior. ?The main difference, as near as I could tell, was than his car
>does not have rear A/C whereas mine does. ?Other than that, except for
>color, the cars are remarkably similar. ?They both have two cigarette
>lighters, whereas the Crown and the LeBaron have three. ?With its lack of
>two tone paint, less interior and exterior trim and cloth seats, the base
>model makes a different statement that the Crowns. ?It was more understated,
>you could say, but it could still have all the mechanical bells and whistles
>you might want. ?The only thing I miss is the passenger side mirror.
>
>Once you chose your trim level, the number of options kept on reducing.
>Certain decisions on the part of the buyer, such as a dislike of leather,
>obligated him to go with the lowest trim level, but, then again, not
>everyone wanted two tone paint, either. ?On the other hand you could still
>get as much "extra" equipment on the car as your pocket book allowed.
>
>The amazing thing is how varied these cars were once you get down to
>specifics. ?For such a low production car, there were no less than three
>different types of wheel cover, one for each trim level. ?In 1958, the
>Imperial was built at the same factory as the Chrysler, but on its own
>production line. ?It must have been relatively leisurely paced. ? 63,681*
>Chryslers were built that year, almost four times as many.
>
>Hugh
>
>
>
>
>----------------- ?http://www.imperialclub.com ?-----------------
>This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
>reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
>shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
>Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
>
>
----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network