Re: IML: Imperial or Not?

[aeyn <mr85000@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello All,
     Well, If there is any question of the 90's Imperials being
REAL IMPERIAL, I can atest that being a former owner of a 1990
Chrysler Fifth Avenue for seven years that the Imperial of that
era were VERY much Immperials.  My 5th was a real was very much a
kin to the Imperial but with out the total trappings and having
owned 2 Imperials (69 LeBaron FDHT and 75 LeBaron FDHT) the Fifth
was very appointed in its own right. I was looking for an
Imperial when I bought the 5th, but one was not to be found in
Las Vegas.  Imperial owners do holder on to their cars longer
that other car owners, so there are not as many available for
resell, but that fact that the Imperials are lower production
numbers than other cars does not make them readily available. 
That can be good and bad (especially for Imperial only parts).  
   But overall, the 80's and 90's Imperial are very much members
of the Imperial family in their own right.  And, by the way, when
my 5th was stolen the first time, I did find some Imperials in
Las Vegas, but my 5th was found intact and kept her another 5
year more.  She was stolen a second time in Portland, Oregon
three years later and was recovered again intact.

Æyn & Patrick

--- anthony romano <mamrom@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> What do you all imperialist think about the come back 81-83 and
> the 90-93 Imperials? Are they worthy of being called Imperial
> which is synonymous with Luxury!



-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm