RE: IML: individual year groups
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: IML: individual year groups



I love the people that put the year in the header.  I have my e-mails sorted in outlook from the header year for me.

So a BIG thanks to all that use the year in their header

Karl

2- 1960 Imperial 4doors

 


From: mailing-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:mailing-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of john sadowski
Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2006 1:19 AM
To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: IML: individual year groups

 

I agree that putting the year in the header is the answer. Also, starting a new post instead of adding a new topic to an existing thread is also desperately needed.

John

----- Original Message -----

Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2006 8:55 PM

Subject: Re: IML: individual year groups

 

Simple fix guys,  list the car year in the heading.  It is a no-brainer

Abe Mantell <mantell@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

That would be great!!!

However, what about the non-specific year e-mails that may be of
interest to everyone??? How would those be filtered??

Abe Mantell
Two 1981 Imperials (down from 5!!!) :-(

<-----Original Message----->
>From: anthony romano
>Sent: 6/14/2006 4:44:10 PM
>To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: IML: individual year groups
>
>I agree! If we could sign up for the years we want to receive by e-mail than
>we wouldn't have to filter it out for ourselves. If you want yrs. 60-69 0r
>90-93 than you merely sign up when registering. Pretty simply. And you
>should be able to add or subtract anytime-Anthony
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "bob smith"
>To:
>Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 12:41 PM
>Subject: Re: IML: individual year groups
>
>
>> that is something i have a problem with also. it is
>> fustrating to see so many emails that do not apply to
>> me or are not what i am looking for!!!
>>
>> --- jesse barboza wrote:
>>
>>> i was thinking that maybe do to the vast varety of
>>> years in the mailing list i was thinking that it
>>> might be more effective to have individual groups.
>>> like 1950-1959 and 1960-to1969 ect. and having
>>> seperate mailing list for each decade not to exclude
>>> anyone but just to make things a bit more uniform i
>>> mean personaly i find it a bit troubling having to
>>> sort through a couple hundred emails only to find 8
>>> or 10 that actually apply to my year get reply if u
>>> agree or hav any comments
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________
>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
>>> protection around
>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> Do You Yahoo!?
>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>
>>
>> ----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
>> This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
>> reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
>> shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
>> Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
>>
>>
>
>
>----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
>This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
>reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
>shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
>Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
>
>.
>

 


Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great rates starting at 1¢/min.



Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.