RE: IML: 'overdrive' details
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: IML: 'overdrive' details



I agree that you might see diminishing returns if you have a high (low numerical) gearset, you should still see an improvement. Our 80's Imperials had 2.24 rears for mpg. I think it was due to the start of CAFE. That's what necessitated the low first gear 998 (904) trans. I'm sure the mileage is improved over a 2.94. Is it worth $3k+ is the question? It would take near forever to pay for itself. I don't like the gearvendors because it doesn't give that much of an o/d. I don't want to gear split. I want my car set up right with an extra extremely high gear for cruise mpg. I'm going to try to stuff an A500 mopar o/d in my car. They have a much bigger o/d than gearvendors, .68 I believe. That's easier for me because my Imperials are small blocks, so I don't have to deal with the bellhousing issue. Of course I still have to deal with the trans tunnel and mount, but since my cars are thousands of miles away, it's fun to dream.

Rob


From: "Rob McCall" <Rob_Mopar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: IML: 'overdrive' details
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 22:42:26 -0400

I haven't tried it yet, but I am heavily considering it for my '04 Diesel
Ram and my '68 Barracuda.  In the Ram with 4.10 gears, even in 6th it is
turning the motor too high for sustained highway use.  It has more than
enough guts, but the mileage drops like a rock.  At 55 MPH and below it's
happy.  Over 55 and goodbye $$$.

The GV unit allows gear splitting, i.e. 1st gear/1st gear in overdrive,
2nd/2nd overdrive, etc.  With the stick shift in the truck, I can see this
being handy.  With an automatic, not as handy.

Now the real question is what rear gear ratio do you have now?  If you are
still running the stock gears, I do not think you will see much of a
difference in mileage. A 2.94 rear gear in overdrive is the equivalent of a
2.29 rear gear.  If you are planning a run to the salt flats, that might be
a good ratio.  If you are running 3.55's, it will drop it down to a 2.77, a
nice highway gear ratio. 3.91's drop down to a still highway friendly 3.05.

I have a spreadsheet at work that I was playing around with during lunch(es) this week calculating RPMs based on MPH, rear gear ratio, and tire diameter. If I remember to send it home tomorrow, I'll be glad to share it with anyone
who is interested.

Other than cutting the driveshaft, the transmission tailshaft housing is
replaced with the GV adapter and the overdrive unit bolts to it.

Rob McCall
'67 LeBaron, probably 2.94 gears.

-----Original Message-----
On Behalf Of Damian Justice

yessir, you have to cut, or replace the driveshaft.  They have
under/overdrive if you are intrested in a quick takeoff followed by high
speed/low rpm.  I am only intrested in low r's on the highway.  I guess
nobody has tried it yet.






-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm





-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm



Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.