Re: IML: 1959 Imperial & Highway HI-FI
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IML: 1959 Imperial & Highway HI-FI



In my opinion it's okay to install a Hiway Hi-Fi or
another period player for looks only (and I'm not what
you'd call an audiophile.)  There are better options
for music on the road!

--- randalpark@xxxxxxx wrote:

> The tone arm is set too heavy for most 45 rpm
> records made during the 60's and newer. This quickly
> causes record damage rendering the recordings
> useless. There were some 45's made that could handle
> the extra weight, but one needs to know what they
> are looking at the tell the difference. 
>  
> Breifly, view the thickness of the record. If there
> is a line that seems to separate the two sides of
> the record, this usually means that it is a coated
> disc. These have less surface noise when new, and
> are more fragile. The absolute maximum stylus
> pressure would be 5 grams to prevent damage. Most
> Columbia 45's, even during the 1950's were made this
> way. If the record is very thin and has no "line",
> it may withstand up to ten grams with only minor
> damage after many playings. Most Capitol 45's and
> some RCA 45's were made this way. Off brands tended
> to be a mix of both styles.
>  
> I seem to remember that the minimum stylus pressure
> of the Highway HI FI that plays 45 rpm records is
> over 10 grams. This was to minimize skipping when
> the car is in motion. I have riden in a '60 Chrysler
> equipped this way. Some of the records sounded okay,
> while others did not. Although very interesting,
> playing records in a moving car isn't very
> practical, especially singles that last all of two
> or three minutes.  
>  
> Paul W.
>  
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: thomash85715@xxxxxxxxx
> To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 1:51 PM
> Subject: Re: IML: 1959 Imperial & Highway HI-FI
> 
> 
> The ubiquitousness of 45s compared with the paucity
> of the specialized 16 RPM originals would seem to
> dictate that as only viable option.  The limited
> bandwidth of the antenna feedthrough method is a
> small price to pay for enjoying a wider range of
> titles.  What real world experience does anyone have
> playing records in a moving car?  --Tom     63
> Custom
> 
> "stephen844@xxxxxxxx" <stephen844@xxxxxxxx> wrote: 
> I have a 1959 Crown Southampton that has the
> original radio that has foot operation.  Can I plug
> a Highway HI-FI into this set or would I have to
> change the radio?  I am looking to add a record
> player to the car and wondered if I would be better
> off to use the later 45 RPM version which conntects
> into the antenna line and the radio is tuned to the
> record player?
> 
> 
> Steve Restelli
> Webmaster, HistoryTV.net
> http://historytv.net 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo!
> Small Business. 
>
________________________________________________________________________
> Check out the new AOL.  Most comprehensive set of
> free safety and security tools, free access to
> millions of high-quality videos from across the web,
> free AOL Mail and more.
> 



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com


-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm



Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright 2018 The Forward Look Network.  All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.