1981 vs 82-83

[<stealthloader@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

  I have an 81 IMP and other than the non-factory carb conversion
the biggest problem I have had was electrical. The headlight switch and 
wiring to the lights was burnt badly and the turn signal switch shorted out. 
I have heard that the headlights are a common problem with 81 to 83 years. 
  The gas gauge sending unit and tank were rusted beyond repair due to 
moisture that built up in the tank from sitting for 9 years as well. The fuel 
pump still works but I took it out since it's caburated.
  I spent $400 repairing the headlights and since I couldn't find a 
replacement fuel gauge sending unit I replaced the entire dash, gauges and 
tank with parts from a Dodge Mirada and a Cordoba, this is still in work!
Dave U.
81 IMP

DAVID MORRISON <drmcross@xxxxxxx> said:

> I am in process of purchasing a 1981 (Nightwatch blue with white leather) 
to replace my 1982 FS.   
> 
> As the first year in the three year production line, has anyone found the 
1981 to be inherently less reliable (ok, more unreliable) than the later 
versions?  I know Chrysler addressed rusting trunk lids midway through 1981 
production, but it seems the mechanicals, electrical and bodywork were 
virtually unchanged from one production year to next.  Radios and colors seem 
primary differences.
> 
> Since 1981 accounts for 70% of Imperial coupes made, it is hard to 
determine just from postings whether Chrysler learned from experience and 
made hidden improvements.  So, for those of you with a 1981 and 1982-83, any 
feelings that the first year is more trouble-prone?  Anything else I should 
be concerned about in making this change?  
> 
> Dave Morrison
> 1982 FS
> 



--