I'm glad I don't live in California, no wonder they call it the left coast ----- Original Message ----- From: "Raymond Shaw" <dienasty233@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 12:44 PM Subject: Re: IML: Fw: CA Senate Bill 708 needs to be defeated > That's all we need to happen, sounds to me we have a bunch of idiots who > have nothing better to do but pass these stupid laws, these aren't car > enthusiasts doing this, I consider my cars a hobby for me, hell I don't > protest other people doing what they want to do, now we have laws trying to > be passed to smog proof all types of cars. > > My 91 Imperial is constantly being picked on by the smog people of Illinois, > it failed a couple of times in the past, so they have to test it to death > year after year just waiting for it to slip. It's plain ridiculous, 95 and > up cars get away with going every two years, but they want mine back after a > year. I have many reasons to hate emisions tests. This is one of them, > it's not about clean air anymore, it's about destroying the cars I love and > can afford, not everyone has the money to go and buy a new car all the time, > plus I hate most of the ways new cars look today, they don't resemble cars, > they all look the same to me. > > I think it sucks that we already lost a bunch of classic cars due to these > emisions laws, not to mention that most of them had a hard time surviving up > north as it is. > > Please keep us posted here, I would hate to see this law go into effect. It > sounds to me like they wont be happy until they get rid of the gasoline > combustion engine for good. They probably would rather have us use solar > powered pieces of junk. > > I think the smog laws are tough the way they are now, but this one is going > way too far. > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail > > >