'69 on Ebay

["Kerry Pinkerton" <pinkertonk@xxxxxxxxx>]

I'd think it would be more like a "must avoid" or "must disconnect" if you
expect to drive the car.  I don't want to have something as critical as
brakes tied up in the first generation of automation when there are probably
not a handful of people who even know what they are and even less that have
the parts.  Autotemp II is bad enough but you can always lower the windows
if that quits working.  If you could not get Dr Dick to adopt you, I guess
you could drag your foot, ala Fred Flintstone..... <grin>

KerryP
Patch panels fabricated
Pinkertonk@xxxxxxxxx
dte.net/57imperial
Imperials -- 50 Limo, 57 roadster, 61's, 62, 68 Convert, 73, a 66 300 and a
bunch of lesser marques
----- Original Message -----
From: Mark Evans <evansma@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2003 8:25 PM
Subject: Re: IML: '69 on Ebay


> Elijah,
> I had a '71 Lincoln Mark III with Sure-Track 4-wheel anti-lock braking
> system. it was optional on all Lincolns from 1969-1979 but standard on all
> Mark series from 1971 through 1979. Don't know who was first. But,
> interesting bit of auto history on just how old this idea is.
>
> I remember first finding out about this feature. This was before the
current
> crop of cars with ABS. I can't repeat the words I used here! :-)
>
> I haven't seen the Chrysler units. Must be a rare option. That makes it a
> "must have" for any Imperial owner!
>
> --MarkE
>
>
>
>