|
>I
now understand why I get so little response from this site my 1929 car is not
considered an >Imperial...Being
english where there are so few Imperials I have always considered all Imperials
>to be a product of
Chrysler...but now I understand I am wrong...
Your car certainly is an Imperial. I don’t think anyone here would disagree. I imagine you get so little response because so many of us have never even seen a ’29 Imperial. There is nothing I could possibly add to any conversation on this car as I know nothing about it. Seems there are many more members with the later model years and a lot more of us that have knowledge of the cars. Even if I can’t offer any input to your post I think the ’29 was a work of art and I am glad you are a member of the list.
Steve B. |
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network