To add to D^2 comments below, a tire that has a low profile will tend to lose traction a lot more suddenly than a relatively high (70 or 75 series) profile tire. The handling of the Imperials is not terribly stellar, at least in comparison with modern cars, however it is extrememly predictable. Riding with Dimitris through the windy mountain roads of Austin, even in the pasenger seat I could feel the onset of understeer as the car began plowing through the corner, and with a slight tap of the brake D^2 was able to bring the rear end around and execute a nice apexed turn. Similarly, if we came into a turn with a lot of power to the rear wheels, you could feel it start to fishtail and a little steering correction was all that was needed to keep a nice line through the turn. While I don't argue one could make an old Imperiual handle better, ride quality would certainly suffer. And don't forget, the laws of physics do apply; a 5500 pound brick on wheels will never handle remotely close to a Porche. Enjoy your brick. > can be said that the suspension of these cars was > never designed for this type > of wheels and tires. Our old cars were designed to > lean a bunch in corners > compared to modern cars, and this type of super wide > and low profile tires will > not like that, and the handling may suffer. For > certain cases, the traction > forces may be too high, far-far higher than the > original bias ply tires that > the suspension was designed for. As a result, you > can expect that the ball > joints and bushings to wear out a lot faster than > normal. Finally, the rolling ===== --Mike Pittinaro One point eight litres Stromberg carburators sing Loose nut at the wheel __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Vote for the stars of Yahoo!'s next ad campaign! http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/yahoo/votelifeengine/