Re: IML: Re:Imperial Mileage
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IML: Re:Imperial Mileage



Since we are dealing with Imperials, I thought we were talking about Imperial
gallon!  :)

No, we were all talking about US gallon.  I suggested earlier the factors that
can affect mileage.  The dif gear ratio was also suggested, as well as the car
size (B bodies and such).  Obviously these are factors too, but since we were
talking about Imperials, I assumed we all have about the same weight and gear
ratios.  Other factors are winter/summer gas.  In the summer, the gasoline is
composed out of less volatile hydrocarbons with more energy content per gallon
(small factor).

Still, those claims of 16 mpg and higher are suspect of measurement errors. 
Even the for the lean burn it may be stretched (the higher compression of the
earlier engines will actually help gas mileage a bit).  The highest reported
mileage from road tests is of the order of 15.

But everything is possible I guess, I cannot rule out these claims with
certaintly.

D^2

Quoting Brad Hogg <roadhogg@xxxxxxx>:

> Ummm, I didn't see anyone qualify that they were NOT talking about the
> larger of the two gallons so I can only assume that they are talking about
> the one I am most familiar with.  If this is not the case, simply stating
> which gallon one is referring to might be in order.
> 
> ;-)
> 
> 
> Please quote this message in your reply.  Otherwise I will be unable to
> reply to your message.  Thanks.
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "ernie stepney" <estepney@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 9:01 PM
> Subject: RE: IML: Re:Imperial Mileage
> 
> 
> Hey Brad you forgot to mention the difference between our gallon and
> that other unit of measurement referred to as a gallon south of the
> 49th.
> 
> Ernie and the Black Bitc_!!
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mailing-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:mailing-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Brad Hogg
> Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 4:14 PM
> To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: IML: Re:Imperial Mileage
> 
> My 77 440 (in my 5000 lb New Yorker Brougham) gets 18.5 mpg on the
> highway
> at normal, legal speeds.
> 
> 
> Please quote this message in your reply.  Otherwise I will be unable to
> reply to your message.  Thanks.
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Don Hudson" <mopar4me@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 1:54 PM
> Subject: Re: IML: Re:Imperial Mileage
> 
> 
> Not specifically Imperially related but on the thread about 440 mileage.
> Back in 89 drove a 69 Charger with a brand new rebuilt 440 to the Nats
> from
> VA, drage raced it a couple of times, drove to and from the motel on
> Brice
> and then home.  19 MPG.  Didn't have highway gears but 2.94s or 3.23s I
> think.  Coverversely a buddy who drove a 318 Challenger I also owned got
> but
> 18 with no racing.  440s can get good mileage.
> Don
> 
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: MNTwin1@xxxxxxx
>   To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>   Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 10:07 PM
>   Subject: IML: Re:Imperial Mileage
> 
> 
>   D^2,
>   OK, so I rounded up from 16.5.  I have checked it on several
> occassions
> and yes I have checked the speed/mileage with a newer car following me.
> This has been one of the best 440s I have owned.  Its not a high mileage
> car
> so maybe that has something to do with it.  I did replace the original
> Holley with a Carter.  I once owned a 76 New Yorker which also got me in
> the
> 17 mpg range on the highway.  A friend has a 77 T&C wagon which has been
> converted from lean burn to a Mopar performance ignition and that big
> girl
> gets 16 mpg.  Worst 440 I had for mileage was my 75 Imperial.  That
> thing
> got 10 mpg no matter if it was in the city or on the highway.
> 
>   Happy motoring.
> 
>   Dale
>   68 Crown Coupe
>   60 New Yorkers
>   78 LeBaron T&C
> 
> 
> 
> -----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
> This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
> reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
> shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
> Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
> 
> 





-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm



Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.