Re: [FWDLK] WHY??
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [FWDLK] WHY??



walter,
the way I heard it, the government   wanted to standardize automatic
transmission selectors, in the name of safety. Chrysler's pushbuttons lost
out to the column shift. There was more to the story but I can't recall it
at present. the Edsel had  pushbuttons on some models as did some other
makes, but all had gone belly up or switched to column selectors...what was
the last year of Mopar pushbuttons anyway?    Roger
-----Original Message-----
From: Walter T. Corey 59 Dodge <BKLYNBOO@xxxxxxx>
To: L-FORWARDLOOK@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <L-FORWARDLOOK@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, September 07, 1998 8:09 AM
Subject: [FWDLK] WHY??


>Not that i'm complaining, ok i am complaining, we all have cars from the
>foward look era of 55-61.  What does the Chrysler Mercedes merge have to do
>with our cars?  Why are you sending out messages about it?  are we losing
>discussion topics?  if so  i have some in mind.
>
>1.I read somwhere that in 65, pushbutton tranny's were banned,  yet they
were
>very reliable.  WHY?
>2 Why does the 58 Plymouth have no front parking lights?
>
>3. Why hasn't anyone bought my car yet?
>        Walter
>




Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.