Hey Curtis!Nice additional info and interesting too! But don't take all this stuff too seriously, after all it was only journalists using primitive test equipment in varying weather and track conditions doing these tests. We all know that a car will perform differently with different drivers on different roads in different weather conditions. Other influences are magazine self promotion and advertising! It still happens today between road tests conducted by different magazines! Level of faith in these tests - 50%!! Level of faith in today's tests - 75% Level of faith when I run my hemis against anyone - 100% Brian D500s in MI Curtis French wrote: I don't mean to put anyone down, but I think people tend to have too much faith in these old magazine road test results. I'd be particularly skeptical of any Motor Trend test results from the 50s as they were in my opinion the least accurate testers in that era. Their times also tended to be a lot slower than other mags got for the same cars. Motor Trend's 57 D500 was a full second slower in the quarter than Car and Driver's 57 D500 and also the same amount slower than Hot Rod's 57 Fury. And according to Motor Trend's testing, a 58 Chrysler 300 is no faster than a 55 New Yorker (and about two seconds slower than everyone else's 300s), which makes no sense whatever. In their May 1954 issue, Motor Trend tested a 54 DeSoto with a 276 hemi V-8 and a 54 Pontiac with a 268 cube flathead 8. Guess which on MT thought was quicker? Yep, MT got a quicker quarter mile time with the flathead Pontiac than the hemi DeSoto. At the time this issue came out, my Dad had a 52 DeSoto and my uncle had a 53 Pontiac. Both had the same motors as the 54 models. So, naturally, my uncle thought his Pontiac could outrun Dad's DeSoto and challenged him to a race. Did the Pontiac win? Could it even hang close? No on both counts. The DeSoto just ran off and left the Pontiac. Caveat emptor.
|