Ok, So, Fearless Leader doesn't want us to discuss the raping that Big-Oil is perpetrating on us (billions is profits, in just the last quarter- year)..... So.....Jim Hoekendijk has written, to say that he believes that Premium Grade gasoline might produce around 10% better fuel economy (& better performance, etc.) than Regular Grade gas. I live @ 4k' elevation, so can run a leaner fuel mixture (I believe) and lower octane-rating, than a car, residing @ sea level. At any rate, I've put Regular grade (87 octane) in Horrie, (9.25:1 c.r.) during the cooler-months, and Mid-grade (89 octane) during 100 degree summer months, without any apparent engine damage (his 325 Hemi did/does not have hardened valve seats,like the CHRY-Hemis have). Does anyone have any real-world documentation, as to the improvement in MPG, that might be produced by a higher octane rating? I do know that "Brand-name" gas is supposed to have mo-better additives (anti-knock/detergent, etc) than the "no-name" generic gas dealers. Now, here comes the interesting (Urban-myth??) part: Regular gas, here costs $2.38; Premo costs $2.58 ($.20/gallon more). If my car "normally" gets around 13 MPG, a 10% increase (from El Premio) would be about 1.3 MPG. For a 20 gallon tank-full, my car would travel ("on average") about 20gal x 1.3 extra-MPG = 26 "extra" miles. The Premium gas would cost $.20 extra/gallon, or: 20gal x $.20 = $4.00 ( "extra"). BUT, with the Regular-grade gas, it would take 'exactly' 2 gallons to travel that same "extra" 26 miles. And, 2 gallons of 'Regular', @ $2.38 = $4.76 , or, $.76 MORE than the cost of the Premium grade of gas!!! So, the equilavent cost of Premium gas is actually about 4 cents/gallon less expensive, than it would appear to be ($.80 (approx-savings divided by 20 gallons), plus your car would benefit from whatever additives/octane that the Premium grade would provide. So, again, has there been any research, or testing-results published, OR, has anyone 'here' done a grade -vs- grade driving comparison, regarding the increased performance that might be expected, in a 9.25:1 c.r. engine?? I do recall the axiom that a higher-octane gas will not benefit an engine that was "designed" for a lower grade of gas. Finally, divide your present cost-of-gas by eight, & see what the "late 1960's" price of your gas, would be (amazing; about $.30, for $2.38- price, now) Neil Vedder ************************************************************* To unsubscribe or set your subscription options, please go to http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1
|