SO, according to your research, the TOTAL assistance provided by the
power brakes calculates to a 72% decreased pressure-
feel coming from the booster, meaning that almost (72% extra) twice the
effort is required to stop a manual braked car?
That's a lot, when you think of it.We've all got stories of having gotten used to a manual brake system (really putting our foot into the brake pedal) and then hitting the brakes on a power-boosted car!I don't know if it's just Farts, but, my parents had a 65 Galaxie 500 convertible, and I also drove a 73-ish Continental, and both cars had very-numb feeling power brake systems.The power-assisted (mine, anyway) FWDLK'er has (had) a very nicely modulated power brake system. Neil Vedder Wayne Graefen wrote: According to my research for the 300C, 28% of the application of brakes in the Chrysler power brake comes from the driver. 72% of the power is applied by the brake booster. I presume these figures apply to all bellows type boosters and are similar to the canister booster which followed. Wayne G************************************************************* To unsubscribe or set your subscription options, please go tohttp://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1 <http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1> ************************************************************* To unsubscribe or set your subscription options, please go to http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1
|