Neil, Not exactly. What Wayne is saying is that if 100% of the pedal pressure to stop the car with non-power brakes is compared to PB, then the PB is 28% of the manual pedal pressure. Roughly 1/4 th. So if the PB booster fails, you have to apply 4 times the pressure. But then that is the normal pressure for non-PB anyway. Let's put it another way. If a fast stop requires 100 lbs of pedal pressure with non-PB, then the same rate of deceleration with PB needs only 28 lbs. If the PB booster fails, you are back to the 100 lbs. In a modern in-line system, if the PB booster fails, you not only need the 100 lbs., but you also have to compress the in-line spring and you need maybe 200 - 300 lbs. to stop. Try it in a safe place sometime. Which is safer, the 50 year old design, or the modern system? Dave Homstad 56 Dodge D500 -----Original Message----- From: Forward Look Mopar Discussion List [mailto:L-FORWARDLOOK@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Eastern Sierra Adjustment Svc Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 1:03 PM To: L-FORWARDLOOK@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [FWDLK] Hissy Fitting (to be continued) SO, according to your research, the TOTAL assistance provided by the power brakes calculates to a 72% decreased pressure- feel coming from the booster, meaning that almost (72% extra) twice the effort is required to stop a manual braked car? That's a lot, when you think of it. We've all got stories of having gotten used to a manual brake system (really putting our foot into the brake pedal) and then hitting the brakes on a power-boosted car! I don't know if it's just Farts, but, my parents had a 65 Galaxie 500 convertible, and I also drove a 73-ish Continental, and both cars had very-numb feeling power brake systems. The power-assisted (mine, anyway) FWDLK'er has (had) a very nicely modulated power brake system. Neil Vedder Wayne Graefen wrote: > According to my research for the 300C, 28% of the application of > brakes in the Chrysler power brake comes from the driver. 72% of the > power is applied by the brake booster. I presume these figures apply > to all bellows type boosters and are similar to the canister booster > which followed. > > Wayne G > > ************************************************************* > > To unsubscribe or set your subscription options, please go to > http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1 > <http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1> > ************************************************************* To unsubscribe or set your subscription options, please go to http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1 ************************************************************* To unsubscribe or set your subscription options, please go to http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1
|