Re: [Chrysler300] Lake Tahoe controversy

["JoeyPilot" <Joeypilot@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear fellow members, I agree with John Hertog and John Nowosaki. I believe 
that the car was either born a 300 or not. Now, where do we draw the line? 
This is the grey area, and since the 300's are worth more than the NYer's 
and etc., full disclosure may not be offered. This is not an easy task to 
determine for anyone; including the AG of Michigan. We don't need that 
input. Let OUR professional members who have the most expertise about them 
make that call. It's our club not the great State of Michigan's. Thank You 
all.


Joe Schmitt
Everett, WA
300-G Hardtop


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <john_nowosacki@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <dan300f@xxxxxxx>; <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 5:18 PM
Subject: RE: [Chrysler300] Lake Tahoe controversy


>I think the definition of 'clone' needs to be examined, too.
>
> The 'cloned' 440 six pack and 426 Hemi 'Cuda and Challenger cars I have 
> seen still retain their original 'N' code 383 VIN numbers.  Those are 
> clones.  They no longer match the configuration that left the factory on 
> the build date.
>
> What we are talking about here is an original car that needs extensive 
> metal replacement due to rust or accident, and will also retain its 
> original VIN, albeit one that matches the actual configuration of the 
> finished product as it left the factory.
>
> There must be some difference between these two scenarios, isn't there?
>
> John
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of dan300f@xxxxxxx
> Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 7:44 PM
> To: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] Lake Tahoe controversy
>
> Hi all:
>
> As most members are, I for one am against cloned 300's being pawned off as
> "real" 300's.  In order for the club to determine what the rules should be 
> for
> cloned cars, perhaps we should first find out what constitutes illegal 
> cloning.
> I suggest as a first step, the club invite the Michigan Attorney General's
> office to give their opinion after an examination of Mr. Burke's car.  If 
> it is
> deemed to be an illegal clone, case closed.  If it is deemed to be a clone
> but not illegal as far as the AG's office is concerned, then the club must 
> make
> some decisions and I feel we have the right people as officers and 
> directors
> to make those decisions.
>
> Dan Reitz
> Northridge, CA
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> For list server instructions, go to 
> http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> For list server instructions, go to 
> http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 



To send a message to this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/