Re: [Chrysler300] old 300s versus current, and future ones?!

["rob kern" <robkern@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Christopher,
    December 12th, 1956 was the debute of the 1957 300C.  The 300C clock and 
mouse pad has 1956 on it which is technically correct as the year the '57 
was introduced (contrary to what the recent e-bay listing for the clock 
stated as a flaw in dating the '57).  300'ly,  ROB KERN
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "christopher beilby" <thelastbestgenius@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 10:00 AM
Subject: [Chrysler300] old 300s versus current, and future ones?!


> It is inevitable that Sept 11 brings one to think of anniversaries.
>
> No one replied to my earlier query as to what date in Sept 1956 was the 
> new
> 1957 Chrysler range released, but I guess sometime about now/soon is
> the/that 50th Anniversary?!
> Seems from afar in Oz, 1957 was sort of a year of 'higher greatness' for
> both Chrysler, the 300, and also most American Car Makers - many out of 
> the
> 57 models are highly regarded today, never mind that 1957 also saw 'safety
> brakes' applied to 'factory motor racing', with Daytona 1957 being the 
> last
> year of 'factory entry' supercharged/multiple carby/, etc 'stock cars'.
>
> By 1957, really only Chrysler of the big three was still playing 'racing' 
> by
> 'the rules book', that perhaps why they did not do better compared re 1956
> and the competition - Ford had injected, blown, and one off racing 368 
> cubic
> inch Lincoln engined stripped streamlined TBirds running around 160mph, 
> and
> GM had it's own multiple somewhat 'non factory' equivalents, whilst 
> Chrysler
> just turned up with one 300C with fuel injection, and even the fast
> Plymouths seem to have been mainly non factory entrants - Privateers knew
> about fairing in headlights, windscreen edges, correct tire pressures, but
> Chrysler seemingly missed badly re all these?!
> Wayne Graefen has a car, 1957 300C, built to race, that unfortunately
> perhaps never did, it's sister 'non racecar' now seeming lost, and only 
> the
> odd 300C, or any other '57 Mopar ever saw competition?
> And come '59, as one 300E feature in the (excellent) latest Club magazine
> says, the edge was gone from former 300 'strengths', a new focus was 
> taken,
> and the hemi gone - however cross ram motors soon re-dressed that loss for 
> a
> few more years before it faded again.
>
> Come the Vietnam War late 60s period, and America thereafter seems 
> slightly
> lost re building iconic cars, and now America 'post 911' is sadly losing 
> too
> many more lives in another War some call a tragic mistake? And Ford's
> Chairman has just stood aside atop damaging latest lost sales, this atop
> huge plant closures and jobs losses at GM, etc..
>
> But amongst any gloom there always is/seems hope for the future, and for 
> one
> example just tonight we have had the 'next President who wasn't' Al Gore 
> on
> TV talking not only of Global Warming (and how the World maybe has to
> forsake it's great love of the internal combustion engine our loved 300s
> have?), but also how we can maybe seek and have a better future.
>
> I can guess there will be those amongst you reading this that may love or
> hate Gore, but disregarding that, he is out there/here trying for a better
> future, on this day when many might have mixed emotions re that terrible
> thing that happened to the world on Sept 11 five years ago.
> Many may have mixed feelings about whether America has helped the 
> terrorism
> situation by going into Iraq, but as one aussie, can I say that America
> stands most tall for the bravery and service of all those going to Iraq 
> and
> Afghanastan, etc, no matter how right or wrong anyone may say the war. 
> (And
> give Gore one thing as an uninvolved 'non US' observer, he sure seems to
> know so much re so many issues, issues outside the US? - and from
> 'knowledge' finally will come the answers?!)
>
> And this current true great daily individual bravery and individual
> sacrifice shows 'America', if it sets a correct course, can emerge into 
> the
> future once again as a great inspiration to others in many fields/areas, 
> as
> it has been with it's iconic cars - 300s and others.  Other countries are
> building cars that America for decades built, ones inspiring a passion or
> desire to own - America can again do likewise, and hopefully ahead is a 
> 300
> that is as awesome as the new V10 BMW M5 in 'M' mode, latest 430 Ferrari
> that seemingly finally is a Ferrari that every Ferrari before it should 
> have
> been but wasn't , or other new current 'street supercars'.
>
> They say we cannot stop 'change' - lucky our 300s are something that at
> least we know for sure   what they are, even though presently no one,
> especailly 300C guru Wayne Greafen, seems to know anything really final re
> my supercharged 300Cs coming 50th Anniversary with Daytona Beach Feb 1957,
> which has led me to start anew at Fond Du Lac where the car owners lived,
> and later raced the car from - any300 member in Fond Du Lac expect an 
> email
> from me asking you to 'go visit' the address where they lived, and seek 
> out
> the Dealer who special ordered the car for them, and went to Daytona in it
> with them.
>
> May we thank those in the past who made sacrifices that made it possible 
> the
> original 300s were built, that we may/do wish to celebrate both their 50th
> letter Series and other Anniversaries, and may we look forward to future 
> new
> great 300s, in a world finally/soon at peace with all who live on it?!
>
>
> Christopher in Oz where our 1st 'new in 9 years' GM family sedan (known as
> Commodore) has just been released - and it has current 300C styling
> shape/cues!!??  - square rear, big flared 300 type guards, verticallish 
> flat
> slab front, poor vision out of cabin some ways !!!?  Previous 4door model 
> is
> nation's biggest seller, was basis for current 2 door GTO sold in US - how
> is that for 'current 300C' trivia/odditity - how will it sell, be 
> accepted?
> (however roof profile side on is not square like 300, looks quite good 
> from
> some angles)
>
>
>
>
> To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> For list server instructions, go to 
> http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
>
> For archives go to http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 



To send a message to this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm

For archives go to http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:Chrysler300-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    mailto:Chrysler300-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/