
Re: Fw: [Chrysler300] Battery/Starter-300F
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fw: [Chrysler300] Battery/Starter-300F
- From: Keith Boonstra <kboonstra@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:05:02 -0400
Well, couldn't John Grady have misspelled a word or missed a comma -
even on purpose - to make himself seem at least a little mortal?
On Amazon Kindle you gotta pay to download a book. This one comes free.
Thanks, John.
Keith Boonstra
-
Jean-Yves Chouinard wrote:
>
>
> Hi to everyone.
> I'm forwarding this tread to the list server as it pertains to Tom's
> starter problems. It's from Club Member John Grady. He is an
> electrical engineer.
> Jean-Yves Chouinard.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: John Grady
> To: 'Jean-Yves Chouinard'
> Cc: Ed Cornish ; Keith Simons
> Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 11:28 AM
> Subject: RE: [Chrysler300] Battery/Starter-300F
>
> Hi,J-Y ;
>
> Maybe I can help. As an EE ,and PE, I have a perspective on it. Maybe
> you can pass this on...
>
> First the starter as designed started thousands if not millions of B
> blocks and hemi's over the years , (at 10 below zero, too! ) and does
> not need redesign or new windings of heavier wire. Heavier wire draws
> more current, which drops the battery volts even more, and needs the
> same # of turns to get the same magnetism, which is what makes the
> force. The force is proportional to turns, as well as to current. As
> more turns of larger wire will not fit in the same space , it is the
> wrong way to go and may make it worse. The resistance of the wire does
> not change or deteriorate over time; it does increase a little when
> hot, but that is normal and was accounted for when the unit was
> designed. Anecdotal talk of how heavier wire improved things has more
> to do with just rebuilding the starter , new brushes etc. Heavier wire
> means an 8 volt starter is now used on 12v; pros and cons to that.
> Works great , fast spin on a nice warm day... may not turn at all when
> cold.
>
> You can separate this into two problems1) the engine is hard to turn
> 2) the starter is not providing full force . It is critical to CLEARLY
> find out which it is (!) before doing anything, or you waste money and
> time.
>
> Hard to turn, but starter OK, is usually timing too advanced
> (distributor weights did not return, or wrongly timed, or "turned up'
> timing in pursuit of performance-this has a characteristic cranking
> sound, quick turn followed by almost stall at TDC, repeat .) , a
> mechanical bind in starter drive (tolerance of starter pinion to ring
> gear-it must not jam-loosen starter and move back etc; damaged or off
> center ring gear.) or something in the engine, transmission or belt
> drive is dragging(unlikely, if car idles and runs OK). A too tight
> piston or ring fit in a rebuilt engine can REALLY aggravate things
> when hot... If starter is good, and you measure starter current draw,
> it will go way up when hot if engine bind is loading it down. Current
> draw on a good starter is always proportional to how hard it is to
> turn, if starter and battery are OK. . So, you really need to know
> that number; you must have a starter ammeter to say anything about
> what is wrong.
>
> Second problem, not enough force from starter, is actually easy to
> troubleshoot. The service manual provides a starter no load speed and
> 'locked rotor " torque value...do what it says, to find out the story!
> --and sometimes gives an ampere draw at locked rotor and free spin.
> You do need a starter ammeter; !!! check the draw IN the car is job #
> 1 !!!, while cranking hot and cold and measure battery volts at the
> same time. The battery should stay at 10.5-11 or more , no matter what
> you do; if not, battery is in question..most common problem, or a
> cheap toy battery. Winter storage allowing it to die and then a spring
> charge cuts 50% out of a battery; a carbon load pile can find
> that.(Harbor tool) . Always buy batteries by weight, not sales
> bullshit; the bigger / heavier the better; store inside on wood
> surface (no concrete) and trickle charge once a month for a 24 hour
> day. Leaving trickle charger on , even fancy 'self turn off" ones, can
> wreck battery by evaporating the water. . Cables must be heavy gauge,
> in good shape and tight. Cheap thin cables loose power, but any
> problems in cables or ends will be accompanied by getting hot when
> trying to start for extended times. Feel the ends for heat after
> cranking for a minute or so. It is not generally necessary to scrape
> paint etc, as bolt has no paint and current goes through that side
> into block too. ..but it cannot hurt.
>
> The free spin test in service manual checks for shorts in armature, as
> it will not rev up to high speed with a shorted armature; you also can
> check resistance from commutator bars to shaft, should be an open
> circuit...most shorts are from winding to shaft or core, but turn to
> turn shorts happen too...and slow down rev test. Test field winding
> for shorts to frame too. There is a free spin rated current, it should
> be within 5-10%.The locked rotor test is a little tricky to do, but
> checks torque output vs. current draw; it draws very high current for
> that, which will find bad brushes or open windings in armature. Worn
> brushes imply a lower spring pressure, and I have seen brushes
> 'frozen" to the brush holders by long storage and so not pressing on
> the commutator; that leads to low torque and bad burning which
> destroys the commutator. Always free up brushes in slides, check them
> when rebuilding a stored car( generator, too) . Problems with armature
> can usually be found visually..a shorted turn will be burned, or
> commutator burned etc. = look carefully.
>
> In the realm of weird things, I had a situation like this, it turned
> out to be the wire lead attachment / big bolt on the starter frame of
> a 60 Dodge. It was OK and tight on the cable, but the nut UNDER the
> lug was loose, (!) which allowed the stud to move sideways in the
> steel and touch the starter frame, (sometimes......!)drawing huge
> current and barely turning,, intermittently. This, from factory. Loose
> starter bearings or off center ends can let armature touch field
> poles, but only when starter is on, magnetism pulls it sideways.
> --that will totally kill output torque.
>
> New battery, generator , regulator , battery cables etc did nothing on
> that 60 Dodge, and a jump would start it , deflecting blame from the
> starter. Correctly tightening the under nut fixed it. So, I
> empathize.... Drove me crazy. Starter Ammeter is what found it. How
> much the headlights dim at cranking is a poor man's ammeter!
>
> The solenoid MUST make the main contact solidly and be correctly
> assembled, as it will spin weakly while engaging, but full torque doe
> not come until solenoid shorts out the pull in winding , which happens
> after pinion is almost all the way in. Tolerances in this are
> critical, someone may have rebuilt wrong. There is no need to run a
> ground right to the starter, as the engine block has a very low
> electrical resistance. In fact shorter, heavier cables and a big fresh
> battery matter most .
>
> The thinking should be: the stock setup is fine, something is wrong
> somewhere..they knew what they were doing. . At a bare minimum , you
> need a starter ammeter, and a voltmeter..and compare with a good car.
> 300F does not crank easily, but stock works fine.
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> John Grady
>
> PS, gear reduction or "geared mini starters" non stock are better, but
> original is fine too. They are better as they have permanent magnets,
> no field winding, gear down gives it more torque at same current draw.
>
> From: Jean-Yves Chouinard [mailto:jymopar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:jymopar%40nb.sympatico.ca>]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 6:38 AM
> To: John Grady
> Subject: Fw: [Chrysler300] Battery/Starter-300F
>
> This is the email from Tom Cox about starter problems...
>
> J.Y.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: Thomas Cox
>
> To: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Chrysler300%40yahoogroups.com>
> ; parts@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:parts%40jcauto.com>
>
> Cc: donbelton313@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:donbelton313%40yahoo.com>
>
> Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 10:14 PM
>
> Subject: [Chrysler300] Battery/Starter-300F
>
> Thanks to the many folks that have given advice. A summary of the
> suggestions:
>
> 1. Make certain the ground connection is to clean metal giving a good
> ground.
> 2. Have the rebuilder use heavier winding materials.
> 3. Ground the battery to the starter (with clean, unpainted connection).
> 4. Cool the starter with water to see if a reduced temperature makes
> the problem lessen to confirm the starter problem.
>
> After all these, I contacted Jeff Carter who has bailed me out of many
> difficult issues with the 300F build. He indicated, in agreement with
> all the above, that it is likely a starter problem that may be due to
> multiple starter rebuilds (or just age) where the field windings have
> deteriorated to the point that they have too much resistance and are
> not funcioning properly and when the starter gets hot, it does not
> provide the electrical boost needed. That, and the probability that
> the windings of the armature are not the heavier-duty variety. He no
> longer knows of a shop that has the knowledge or the parts to do a
> proper rebuild with new field windings and armature rewinding.
>
> Do any of our members have a starter shop that has this experience and
> parts to do a complete and proper rebuild? It seems that may be the
> best solution to the problem at hand. I imagine other folks are
> having, or will have, a similar need. Louie Barrie indicated that he
> had a fellow with a great deal of knowledge about these things. Any
> leads would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Tom Cox
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.437 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2777 - Release Date:
> 03/29/10 06:32:00
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.437 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2779 - Release Date:
> 03/30/10 06:32:00
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
To send a message to this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
For archives go to http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
Chrysler300-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Chrysler300-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network
Archive Sitemap