Re: [Chrysler300] Chrysler 300 oil

["Michael Reed" <mrreed@xxxxxxxxx>]

I believe he meant to use the word "homogenzation" -- as in "homogenize" or "homogenate".

Mike Reed in Lake Odessa, Michigan


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Ron Waters 
  To: retromobilia@xxxxxxxxxxx 
  Cc: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 9:30 PM
  Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] Chrysler 300 oil


    
  JD -

  I'm interested in reading the articles in the magazines that you mentioned. Can you furnish me with the month/year of these articles ? Auto Restorer is an excellent magazine and I'm especially interested in what their take is on this. 

  Not sure what you mean by 'homologation'. I looked the word up and it has nothing to do with motor oil. I'm also hoping that one or more of the petroleum engineers in the audience will chime in on this discussion.

  Thanks,

  Ron

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: retromobilia@xxxxxxxxxxx 
  To: Ron Waters 
  Cc: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 8:09 PM
  Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] Chrysler 300 oil

  Ron
  Source is various magazine articles in, Auto Restorer, Hemmings Classic Car and at least two reports on our user-group that users have found deposits in oil pan and other surfaces after poring in additive. I doesn't take an imagination or an engineer to see the difference in a manufactured homologation of zinc in oil while being produced and pouring a "zinc liquid" into your crankcase waiting for it to mix and homologate with oil, as you idle your engine, and do its job; Or does it?

  If we have an engineer out there, who has researched this topic, should we ask him to come forward for the benefit of the club. Explaining the pros and cons.....

  I also remember Slick 50; A big money maker and a good quality oil.....thats all !?

  J D Jung
  Retromobilia.net

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: "Ron Waters" <ronbo97@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  To: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2010 5:23:23 PM
  Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] Chrysler 300 oil

  What is your source for this information ? If you are going to make a claim 
  like this, it needs to be backed up with facts.

  Ron

  > Tom,
  > I understand that this type of additive does not bond with the oil and can 
  > leave deposits in some unwanted and wasted places like the filter and oil 
  > pan, rocker arms, pushrods, and so on.
  >
  > J D Jung
  > Retromobilia.net
  >

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



  

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

To send a message to this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx or
go to http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/join and select the "Leave Group" button

For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm

For archives go to http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/search.htm#querylangYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    Chrysler300-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    Chrysler300-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/