The current format works for me it is simple and to the point. I belong to other group forums and for the low volume this is great. I vote to keep it the same format.
Sent from my iPhone
Hello Group:
Having read Hugh's explanation as to why he feels
the way he does, I understand his position. However, as pointed out,
setting something like that up will involve a lot of effort on someone's
part (if, in fact, it can be done on the Yahoo base). I therefore
have a suggestion -
Since Hugh is the one who believes that this
forum approach would be more beneficial, and that the present system is more
than lacking, I suggest that he be the one to set up the
forum format and administer it, at least initially. I am sure that,
if it is as advantageous as he believes it to be, it will be embraced by the
membership and may become the standard. Otherwise, in effect,
what he is doing is suggesting that "the club" (which, of course, means Bob,
Don, et al.) spend the time and effort to set it up which, in my opinion, would
be a great imposition, in view of the work that they already do just to maintain
the list server.
So, I guess what this comes down to is how badly
Hugh wants this forum format. Do you want it enough to do the work
yourself to get it done, or do you just expect others to do it, for your
convenience?
With all due respect,
Pete Fitch
Good
morning. Sorry if I come across as negative, but this frustrates
me. I will make one more effort to make my point with you, because I do
greatly respect the membership, and want you to understand (if not agree with)
my perspective.
Modern Car
Forums do not inundate members with every email sent by every member, for good
reason. Even if the 300 Club has much lower traffic than most of these
user groups, there are still many exchanges per day that a significant
contingent of us would opt out of if they could narrow the focus of what they
see. The general migration from the “list server” environment has
occurred for that reason. You go to it, not the other way
around.
I wish all
aspects of what is exchanged currently via email was cataloged in such a way
that these “threads” could be discussed, monitored, searched and accessed in a
logical fashion. This is the strength of forums which design an
interface for the users that accomplishes these goals. Here is an
example, if you could give it a quick glance, perhaps my point would better
resonate: http://www.alfabb.com/bb/forums/
. This is much more involved than what we would need, but the structure
is applicable. We could have a far superior organizational gathering
point.
When I joined
the group, and initially questioned the “everybody gets everything” approach,
I had many positive (private) replies supporting me. However, I was also
warned that the group was not open to change, and that has become quite
apparent. The old “just hit the delete button” comment tells me that
much of the member population is used to putting up with unwanted content in
their inbox, and doesn’t want it (or understand that they could have it) any
other way. To me, that is a puzzling choice. Of course, my
opinion is colored by experience with other (extraordinary)
forums.
But, in the
meantime, I am either lazy, a scold, or a general malcontent who has ideas
that are unsuitable. I truly enjoy many of the stories and exchanges
even if they don’t pertain to my K. They just shouldn’t all land on my
doorstep, rather I should be able to seek them out as I have the time, and
inclination to do so. This is how most user forums survive and
thrive. They also build a database of knowledge that is invaluable, and
can outlive us all, for the good of the hobby.
Perhaps I
will just pack up my tent and leave (applause). I am sure I won’t be the
first to do so, wondering why the group comports itself in such a
fashion. I just hate the see the vast knowledge base relegated to
such a clunky (IMHO) distribution approach.
Peace-
I don't personally mind if we see some ads on the forum
such as we do from Mr. Schwandt, as long as they are not so numerous as to be
an annoying load on the Inbox. Deleting is quick. But I would like to
suggest that the link to our Club website For Sale page be noted down in the
bottom block of all of the forum posts. It would make it a convenient and
quick one-click ride for those looking to buy or sell parts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I was amazed - as a rare visitor to the page - by how few
ads (22!) there are on the page. So maybe providing the link will make it a
more popular place to use for the sharing of our parts.
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 6:37 PM, cbilter@xxxxxxxxx [Chrysler300] <Chrysler300-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To all: most members are
aware of this, but as a reminder we do have a classified ad section for parts
on the website that the whole world can see (for broad exposure), and photos
can be included as well http://www.chrysler300club.com/rcmstuff/partsforsale.html
As
far as the listserver goes, if the parts ads are applicable to Chrysler 300s,
then they should be appropriate content per the listserver rules.
Carl
Bilter Electronics Communication Committee
From: Anna F Noia sa-noia@xxxxxxxxxxx
[Chrysler300] Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2016 4:45 PM To: Val Jeffers;
EMills_ATC; Hugh Baldus; David Schwandt; chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Club; Ray Jones Subject: Re:
[Chrysler300] Using the listserver to actively sell parts
To All I agree with Ray, just delete what you don't want to look
at. I like to see the interesting, rare, obscure and unobtainable stuff
available from this site, even if I don't need it. I have purchased some
things I didn't know was available until I saw them, to me that's a plus. I
personally like this site. IMHO. Best Regards, Stephen A.
Noia 1-408-210-4736 cell
On Saturday, December 10, 2016 2:05 PM,
"Val Jeffers edward1108@xxxxxxxxx [Chrysler300]" <Chrysler300-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I agree Hugh !
On Saturday, December 10, 2016 4:18 PM, "EMills_ATC
millserat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [Chrysler300]" <Chrysler300-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Personally I don't mind - unless it gets a lot more frequent that it
currently is - but if there were a Classified section on this site, that would
be fine too as long as its easily accessible - I find it cumbersome to log
onto the yahoo site. Edward Mills Antique Tractors 1930-1960 Antique Cars
1960-1985 On 12/10/2016 3:11 PM, Hugh Baldus hugh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[Chrysler300] wrote: Anyone else, besides me, prefer not to
receive an email every time David has something to sell? And then,
another email when it is no longer for sale (gasp). I find it tedious
and intrusive, and not a good use of the forum. “Hey, I
need an obscure part for my E”: Just fine for mass distribution (until
our forum works like other bulletin boards, and not everyone sees everything
anybody sends). Hey, I have an obscure part to sell for
’61-‘64s”: Not ok. This belongs in a classified section somewhere
else, like on a website. Thank
you, Hugh Baldus 260.424.2366 From: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 'David Schwandt'
finsruskw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [Chrysler300] Sent: Saturday,
December 10, 2016 1:47 PM To: chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Club Subject: [Chrysler300]
NOS Parts 1236-219 Pinion gear set. (2 gears)
NOS in unopened original boxes Fits all 55-56 6 and 8 cyl except
Imperial Also fits all 57-58-59 6 cyl. Check your parts books to be
certain. $25 PPD in USA Thanks! Dave
Schwandt
[Non-text portions of this message have been
removed]
__._,_.___
Posted by: scooter465@xxxxxxx
To send a message to this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx or
go to https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/all/manage/edit
For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
For archives go to http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/search.htm#querylang
__,_._,___
|