RE: Aluminum vs. cast iron
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Aluminum vs. cast iron





Interesting info, thanks.  I guess though, to minimize alterations, modifications, and fabrication to make the stock throttle, tranny kickdown, and air cleaner fit, you should use the Performer since it is not a high rise.

Mike in New Mexico




  


 

> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> From: spigot2039@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Aluminum vs. cast iron
> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 05:48:25 -0500
> 
> 
> Check out "Mopar Intake Manifold Shootout" here:
> http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/hrdp_0801_mopar_intake_manifolds/edelbrock_performer_rpm_manifold.html
> 
> Thanks,
> Gary H.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> 
> >
> >
> >Who makes the performer RPM ? How is it for torque and what is the best rpm 
> >range? Is it single plane or dual plane? I have a 413 engine. Thanks for 
> >any input................MO...sw iowa
> >----- Original Message ----- 
> 
> >
> >>
> >> The original 383 4bbbl can be updated by a 383 magnum intake. The 
> >> diffference is quite noticable.However compared to a Perfomer RPM the 
> >> Performer RPM will have it all over both in every area just like ugly all 
> >> over a moose!
> >> Don
> >> ----- Original Message ----- 
> >> From: <roger@ 
> >>
> >> My guess is The old stock 4barrel will be more on the torque side-smaller 
> >> shorter plane.
> >> I have my original 65 manifold on my HP383. I love it. I use an edelbrock 
> >> 650 cfm w it and a one inch spacer.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ------Original Message------
> >> From: mikelj@ 
> >>
> >>
> >> Any opinions out there about which 4 bbl. intakes would be better for a 
> >> '64 383, the original cast iron ones or the newer design aluminum 
> >> aftermarket types?
> >>
> >> Mike in New Mexico 
> 
> 
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
> 
> '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 
> 

--
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 













Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.