RE: Aluminum vs. cast iron

[Doug Jacobsma <big_jake57@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Which brings up a point I was pondering.  Is there a hood clearance or linkage problem with Performer or the older Torkers ect type intakes?
I don't recall problems with RB engines years ago, but I ran smaller aircleaners on those.  Kinda like the looks of the one I have on my 383, which is a '69 magnum from a Charger,  but I guess going to something else wouldnt be the end of the world either.

Jake
'63 Sport Fury 'vert










----------------------------------------
> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> From: Dodger7998@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Aluminum vs. cast iron
> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:31:59 -0400
>
>
>
> unless your linkage was for a four barrel manifold in the first place you
> will have to modify
>
>
> In a message dated 3/27/2009 10:17:48 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
> mikelj@xxxxxxx writes:
>
>
>
>
> Interesting info, thanks. I guess though, to minimize alterations,
> modifications, and fabrication to make the stock throttle, tranny kickdown, and air
> cleaner fit, you should use the Performer since it is not a high rise.
>
> Mike in New Mexico
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
>> From: spigot2039@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: Aluminum vs. cast iron
>> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 05:48:25 -0500
>>
>>
>> Check out "Mopar Intake Manifold Shootout" here:
>>
> http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/hrdp_0801_mopar_intake_manifolds/edelbrock_performer_rpm_manifold.html
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Gary H.
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Who makes the performer RPM ? How is it for torque and what is the best
> rpm
>>>range? Is it single plane or dual plane? I have a 413 engine. Thanks for
>>>any input................MO...sw iowa
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> The original 383 4bbbl can be updated by a 383 magnum intake. The
>>>> diffference is quite noticable.However compared to a Perfomer RPM the
>>>> Performer RPM will have it all over both in every area just like ugly
> all
>>>> over a moose!
>>>> Don
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: 
>>>>
>>>> My guess is The old stock 4barrel will be more on the torque
> side-smaller
>>>> shorter plane.
>>>> I have my original 65 manifold on my HP383. I love it. I use an
> edelbrock
>>>> 650 cfm w it and a one inch spacer.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------Original Message------
>>>> From: mikelj@
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Any opinions out there about which 4 bbl. intakes would be better for a
>>>> '64 383, the original cast iron ones or the newer design aluminum
>>>> aftermarket types?
>>>>
>>>> Mike in New Mexico
>>
>>
>> ----
>> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
> directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as
> well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the
> Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the
> total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
>>
>> '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
>> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.
>>
>
> --
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
> directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as
> well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the
> Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the
> total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
>
> '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.
>
>
>
>
> **************Free Credit Report and Score Tracking! Get it Now for $0 at
> CreditReport.com.
> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1220474599x1201401934/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fwww.creditreport.com%3Fsrc%3Daolemail%26kwd%3Dmlftrtextlin
> k)
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
>
> '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail® is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast.
http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_70faster_032009


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 

This email was sent to: arc.6265@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

u/?bUrDWg.bSONJP.YXJjLjYy



?p=TEXFOOTER