RE: Aluminum vs. cast iron

[bt6t4@xxxxxxxxx]

I have a stock air cleaner on my 426 w/ a SP Mopar performance intake and have 1" clearance. Make sure your motor mounts are good.

George


--- On Fri, 3/27/09, Doug Jacobsma <big_jake57@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Doug Jacobsma <big_jake57@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: Aluminum vs. cast iron
> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Friday, March 27, 2009, 8:53 AM
> Which brings up a point I was pondering.  Is there a hood
> clearance or linkage problem with Performer or the older
> Torkers ect type intakes?
> I don't recall problems with RB engines years ago, but
> I ran smaller aircleaners on those.  Kinda like the looks of
> the one I have on my 383, which is a '69 magnum from a
> Charger,  but I guess going to something else wouldnt be the
> end of the world either.
> 
> Jake
> '63 Sport Fury 'vert
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------
> > To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> > From: Dodger7998@xxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: Aluminum vs. cast iron
> > Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:31:59 -0400
> >
> >
> >
> > unless your linkage was for a four barrel manifold in
> the first place you
> > will have to modify
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 3/27/2009 10:17:48 A.M. Central
> Daylight Time,
> > mikelj@xxxxxxx writes:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Interesting info, thanks. I guess though, to minimize
> alterations,
> > modifications, and fabrication to make the stock
> throttle, tranny kickdown, and air
> > cleaner fit, you should use the Performer since it is
> not a high rise.
> >
> > Mike in New Mexico
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> >> From: spigot2039@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: Re: Aluminum vs. cast iron
> >> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 05:48:25 -0500
> >>
> >>
> >> Check out "Mopar Intake Manifold
> Shootout" here:
> >>
> >
> http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/hrdp_0801_mopar_intake_manifolds/edelbrock_performer_rpm_manifold.html
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Gary H.
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Who makes the performer RPM ? How is it for
> torque and what is the best
> > rpm
> >>>range? Is it single plane or dual plane? I have
> a 413 engine. Thanks for
> >>>any input................MO...sw iowa
> >>>----- Original Message -----
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> The original 383 4bbbl can be updated by a
> 383 magnum intake. The
> >>>> diffference is quite noticable.However
> compared to a Perfomer RPM the
> >>>> Performer RPM will have it all over both
> in every area just like ugly
> > all
> >>>> over a moose!
> >>>> Don
> >>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>> From: 
> >>>>
> >>>> My guess is The old stock 4barrel will be
> more on the torque
> > side-smaller
> >>>> shorter plane.
> >>>> I have my original 65 manifold on my
> HP383. I love it. I use an
> > edelbrock
> >>>> 650 cfm w it and a one inch spacer.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ------Original Message------
> >>>> From: mikelj@
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Any opinions out there about which 4 bbl.
> intakes would be better for a
> >>>> '64 383, the original cast iron ones
> or the newer design aluminum
> >>>> aftermarket types?
> >>>>
> >>>> Mike in New Mexico
> >>
> >>
> >> ----
> >> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to
> only one person --
> > directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car
> transactions and negotiations as
> > well as other personal messages only to the intended
> recipient, not to the
> > Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect
> your privacy, reduce the
> > total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal
> to Mopar topic. Thanks!
> >>
> >> '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion
> Guidelines:
> >>
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.
> >>
> >
> > --
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> > ----
> > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to
> only one person --
> > directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car
> transactions and negotiations as
> > well as other personal messages only to the intended
> recipient, not to the
> > Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect
> your privacy, reduce the
> > total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal
> to Mopar topic. Thanks!
> >
> > '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion
> Guidelines:
> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > **************Free Credit Report and Score Tracking!
> Get it Now for $0 at
> > CreditReport.com.
> >
> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1220474599x1201401934/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fwww.creditreport.com%3Fsrc%3Daolemail%26kwd%3Dmlftrtextlin
> > k)
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> > ----
> > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to
> only one person -- directly to that person. I.e., send
> parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other
> personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the
> Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your
> privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the
> content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
> >
> > '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion
> Guidelines:
> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.
> >
> >
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail® is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really
> fast.
> http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_70faster_032009
> 
> 
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one
> person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car
> transactions and negotiations as well as other personal
> messages only to the intended recipient, not to the
> Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your
> privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the
> content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> 
> '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.