Re: IML: my opinion on a revived Imperial

["mike sutton" <mikanlin62@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Personally , opinion here and Im probably in the extreme minority, I hope 
they dont try to revive the Imperial.  I have my own thoughts on what an 
Imperial is , and isnt, and for once Im very much inclined to agree with 
Kenyon on this.  His statement was very eloquent and thought out, and in 
light of the corporate bean counter mentality its probably right on.

As far as my own thoughts,  Imperial is Imperial..not Chrysler Imperial, not 
Imperial by Chrysler, and until wool sweaters are needed in Hades never 
Imperial by Daimler..but thats just me.   I can handle the fact that not all 
Imperials are rear drive v-8, and I wont diss on those cars because there 
are others here who love them.  For me, its got to be 20 acres of steel with 
a huge engine , extreme creature comforts , luxury and all that goes with 
it.

The Imperial may be dead, but long live the Imperial.  I await the slings 
and arrows , feel free to email me so I can tell you how I really feel ! :)

Mikey
62 Crown Coupe 




-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm